Will an Apple 300i external SCSI CD-ROM work with a Sun? I know this has
been talked about here before but I don't remember what the verdict was
or if any modifications can be made.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Let us live! Let us love! Let us share our darkest secrets! ... you first. -
>From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
>Subject: Re: AAUI
>
>> Apple can't be blamed for the lack of drivers for various
>>cards though. I have used any number of PC PCI boards in my PCI
>>Mac's, including USB, Firewire and video boards. The slots
>>themselves are compliant with the PCI standard. It's just a matter
>>of lacking 3rd party drivers. Creative Labs is releasing a Mac
>>version of it's SB Live, NVidia has done Mac versions of it's
>>Geoforce boards, 3Dfx did Mac versions of it's Voodoo4 and Voodoo5
>>boards just before they went under, and Adaptec has done Mac versions
>>of many of it's SCSI boards.
>
>My back still hurts, so I'll keep typing....
>
>Sure I can blame Apple for the lack of drivers, if stinking Apple wrote a
>"generic" driver or even published a stable API for its non standard PCI
>byte swapped version of PCI then plenty of cards would have worked on the
>mac. As it was, ONLY a handfull of often third parties ever bothered to
>write a mac driver for a PC PCI card, and mac users paid through the nose
>for those items.
To some degree, though, I wonder if there isn't a supply and demand
issue in effect.
For instance, I've never gotten why no one has written a 3rd party
OpenTransport driver for common PCI Ethernet NICs such as the
EtherLink III or the cheap NE2000 clones. Apple has published sample
driver code and the board-level code is public enough from NetBSD or
Linux, yet no one has ever put the two together. From what I can
tell, the same is the case over in the PCMCIA world with few cards
having MacOS support.
>Firewire was always an Apple first product, my guess is that some PC
>products may have Apple ancestry in the driver code or at least high level
>design. Sort of true for USB, except in the PC world about half the cards
>meet the open standard that is what Apple drivers recognize, and half don't
>and hence won't work with Apple drivers (nobody "really" AFAIK makes a
>Apple specific USB driver).
OHCI (supported by Apple) versus UHCI. Ironically, I find that a lot
of the cheapest cards are the compatible ones.
>PCI Video cards I follow pretty closely, and MAYBE a total of 10 cards work
>with macs, with half of those being somewhat generic PC PCI cards. Not
>moving closer to the AGP PC standard was killing Apple video performance,
>so maybe the latest macs have better compatibility, I don't know the
>details of that however.
Video cards are the worst since it is not only a matter of drivers,
but also of firmware. As I understand it, a video card has to have
OpenFirmware code for it to be usable.
>Oh happy day, we get the two year old most overpriced PC sound card,
>without all the features, finally for the mac.
Okay, but why do I want it anyway?
>I have fun with old macs, I currently use a Starmax for daily stuff, but I
>am moving to daily PC use because I am sick of browsers on the mac that
>don't work. In a word, javascript, love it hate, heck I don't even know
>exactly what it is, but it doesn't work on mac browsers and that means many
>pages I want to access I can't.
I'm curious... what browser versions have you had the problem with?
iCab aside, I've had less trouble with Javascript implementations
than with sites that arbitrarily lock out non-Windows users, even if
the site would otherwise work.
<<<john>>>
I would like to find some sort of mapping software that will allow me to
input a set of longitude and lattitude coordinates and a mileage radius
>from that point, ideally backset with the boundaries of the US States
where the coordinates lay. What I am hoping to get is a visual of
the preponderance of data points.
If you took the VCF East survey (http://www.vintage.org/survey.html)
you'll remember that one of the questions was to the effect of "you would
come only if it is within X miles" where X was a number you input. So I
would like to see where most of the data points and their radius areas
intersect.
If anyone has any suggestions for some free mapping software of this ilk,
please e-mail me privately <sellam(a)vintage.org>. Otherwise I guess I'll
just have to write me some :)
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
I was at the Dayton Computer show last weekend (at the Hara Arena, same place
as the Dayton Hamvention) and picked up a handful of, I thought, 8MB parity
SIMMs. They are, but they happen to be 80-pin, not 72-pin.
So... what strange DEC gear uses them? Old AXP boxes? Old MIPS boxes?
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Hi
Well today was kinda slow I guess....finds:
1 fully equipped C128 -1541 II and both P.S.s...$10
1 1084S monitor $5 (cant pass them up at that price even if I have about 10 of these...)
This is a "weird" (I refuse to use L@@K RARE! because of its over use on ebay) one:
1 AES 7100 Office System. Obviously a Z80 machine from the early 1980s. >From AES a Montreal, Canada company (local stuff!)
1 know of one other non-active collector (still collecting?) who has one. He put up photos so Ill post the URL for there so you can have a look at it and maybe tell me more about this thing:
http://www.total.net/~hrothgar/museum/AES7100/
Its the exact same computer. Mine is in terrific shape but I dont have the manuals like this guy does. I do have 2 original boot disks that I was told will boot (to what?) the machine....have not tried it yet...
These are "hard sectored" 5 1/4 disks...eeesh...and I only have the 2 original ones...ooooh
The look of this computer is very "Space 1999ish" if you ask me...
Perhaps this person has already posted here about this machine but I taught I would try again and maybe perhaps something new will come up...
Claude
Canuk Computer Collector
http://computer_collector.tripod.com
On Mar 24, 18:25, Mike Ford wrote:
> I was at Micro Center last night (in So Cal) and they had a stack of grey
> flip top bins with a 99 cent cable sale. Since I have thousands of cables
> at home I pawed through it to the bottom of the four bins on top and
peeked
> into one of the bins below. Lots of AC power cords, but I did pull out
> about a 20' section of some kind of fibre. Since I know a have a AUI FDDI
> type mau's I am guessing putting a section of fibre in my ethernet
network
> is fairly practical. Any suggestions on how to do it?
FDDI is a ring system, not point to point like FOIRL and 10baseFL, and it's
*not* Ethernet. It uses different protocols. I can't remember if you can
have a ring as small as 2 nodes, but I don't see why not. Anyone?
What kind of fibre it is (backbone or patch lead; 50/125 or 62/125
multimode or single mode)? Is the fibre terminated with suitable
connectors? If not, it won't be cheap to get connectors put on the ends.
Is it damaged (rudementary test by shining a bright light down it, though
that will only tell you if it's really badly damaged, it won't tell you
much else about losses). IIRC, FDDI uses lasers rather than LEDs (FOIRL
and 10baseFL use LEDs) so don't look into them!
If your MAUs really are FDDI, take a look at the FDDI FAQ at
http://www.cicese.mx/~aarmenta/frames/redes/fddi/FDDIFAQ.html and the FDDI
tutorial at http://www.iol.unh.edu/training/fddi/htmls/index.html.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Ok...
So far since my email myself and 4 others are interested in the
equipment, I emailed the seller and asked if I could pay in advance by
PayPal to secure the equipment and arrange for next weekend to drive
down and pick it all up. I personally want dibs one 1 cube, monitor
and color printer, so there is still a ton of stuff left, anyone who
wants to join on, please resond back, the more the merrier and everyone
will walk away with some great equipment & software for great prices, so
reply and lets build up the list, please only respond if your serious
and will follow through, I'm putting $1,000 out of my pocket on this to
secure all of this stuff for everyone, please be curteous and not back
out.
Curt
I just received a load of Apple MACS. Among them about a half dozed
LC550's from a school. They work great except they are password
protected except the student accounts. Is there a way to bypass the
password protection on these or will they need an operating system
reload? What is the latest that these will run. They have 7.5.3 loaded
now.
Brian.
A few weeks ago, I requested information about a battery for
my Sharp PC-4502 (a portable PC from the mid to late 1980s),
yet received no replies. The original batteries made for the
Sharp PC-45XXs were from Yuasa, which no longer makes them.
The main problem with this battery is its odd shape; other
batteries have similar specifications, but will not fit
inside this portable PC.
Just as I was about to give up, I simply did a Yahoo search
on Sharp batteries and the PC-4502 and found a source! If
anyone needs a battery for these machines, go to The Raymond
Sarrio Co. at http://www.sarrio.com -- and if you specifically
need a battery for a Sharp PC-45XX like mine, go to this site:
http://www.sarrio.com/sarrio/laptopsh2sy.html
Phone: (800)413-1129
FAX: (508)355-8261
I bought the battery for only $49.00, including free 3-day
air mail! (They used to cost around $75.00.) The AC
adaptors are also listed alongside their batteries, in case
you need one of those, too.
These folks can also make a lot of batteries, if for some
reason they don't have your exact make. So there *is* still
hope for old machines when you least expect it.
Jerry... on his IBM PC/AT 5170 Model 339 | My laptop computer's a
***** 9600kbps/30MB HD/512k RAM/8 MHz | Tandy TRS-80 Model 100
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2X - Registered
On Mar 24, 20:24, ajp166 wrote:
> From: jpero(a)sympatico.ca <jpero(a)sympatico.ca>
> > > I haven't been following this thread as close as I should.
> > > I was working at Intel during the period when ether net was just
> > > being defined. The reason for the 2.5m spacing was to insure that
> > > any collision was detected by all of the unit on the wire.
> > > The idea was that the pulses would be exactly overlapped. This was
> >
> > In that case, surely the correct spacing of transceivers would depend
> on
> > the velocity factor of the cable. And while the stnadard specifies the
> > spacing (2.5m +/- 5cm IIRC), it doesn't specify the velocity factor
> > (other than it must be greater than 0.77 IIRC).
>
> I recall that in musical stuff and in wirings often these waves
> travelling in any tube or wirings tend to be standing waves that why
> that marking is where the amptitudes is greatest.
That can't be the case with 10Mb thick ether because the distance between
markings is about 1/9th of the wavelength.
I did find one thing that relates back to something Bill mentioned in an
earlier post about specific lengths.
>From http://www.ots.utexas.edu/ethernet/10quickref/ch3qr_4.html
The specifications note that the thick coaxial segment should
ideally be built using a single piece of cable from the same
cable spool or from cable spools all manufactured at the same
time (known as a cable lot). If cable from different lots is
used to build up a thick coax segment, then the specifications
note that the sections of cable used should be 23.4 meters,
70.2 meters, or 117 meters in length (all lengths may be +/-
0.5 meters). The reason for using these lengths of cable is to
minimize the chance of having excessive signal reflections
build up due to the slight variations in electrical
characteristics that can occur between different cable
manufacturers or cable lots.
The basic distance quoted is the same as the distance I calculated
yesterday for one bit time: 23.4m.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York