> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Donzelli [mailto:aw288@osfn.org]
> > workstations. Clipper based, and pre-clipper (were they
> VAX?) Intergraph
> > systems.
> The early big servers were VAX based. In fact, they were mostly just
> rebadged. RCS/RI has an Intergraph VAX 8550. It has some
> really strange
> custom hardware in the disk controllers - something about
> these things
> could do searches thru files on the disks for specific
> graphics entities
> (for CAD) without bothering the processor. Odd.
"Really-strange-custom-hardware" was Intergraph's middle name for the
longest time. That's what makes their systems so interesting.
> > There's one CDC workstation that was a re-badged Indigo, that's
> > relatively common. It's the only CDC system I've seen for sale.
> CDC was rebadging IRIS 3000 machines as Cyber 910s.
*Really*? What are my chances of finding one? I'd love to have an IRIS
3000, if I found that I could fit it in the house. :) Did they run the
early versions of IRIX?
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> I'm pretty sure I have a copy of Warp 4 Server, if I can find it. I'll
> look this weekend. ISTR, though, hearing that the OS/2 CDs don't image
> well. Does anybody know whether that's true? I maintain that a
> byte-for-byte dd will work on *anything*. Very Slowly. :)
Well, I've never met a standard CD that it wouldn't work on. I was told
third-hand by somebody who worked for SGI that their media was somehow "copy
protected" and couldn't be reproduced well.
I've successfully imaged my IRIX 6.2 media and booted/installed my system
>from the backup. Works fine.
Also have done VMS, Solaris, and one of the "extras" disks that goes with
AIX. All of them worked fine.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
At 04:28 AM 12/18/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Actually, for manufacturing operators, in IBM, women on average make more
>than men.
I don't know if it has changed but when I was with IBM they paid for
performance in manufacturing. Those who contributed the most were paid the
most.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gene(a)ehrich.com
gehrich(a)tampabay.rr.com
P.O. Box 3365 Spring Hill Florida 34611-3365
http://www.voicenet.com/~generic
Computer & Video Game Garage Sale
I accept PayPal
To subscribe to automatic updates send a blank e-mail to:
online-garage-sale-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com
More office cleanout finds:
I salvaged a new, shrink-wrapped copy of OS/2 Warp Version 3, Red label
(needs a separated copy of DOS/Windows), 3.5" disks. I'm offering it free
for postage (5 pounds) or pickup in the Chicago Loop. Email me at
robert_feldman(a)jdedwards.com. I will decide among multiple requests next
week (after Christmas holidays).
Bob
> I based my statement upon information gleaned from conversations with my
> customers, 80% of which are black. Most of them think that Kwanzaa was
> "made up" by retailers in order to get their money. Some have told me that
> they resent the "social engineering" aspect of Kwanzaa. Here in the South,
> there seems to be very little support of or identification with this event
> among African-Americans.
Doubtlessly true; I've heard some people say the same thing about Christmas.
> > January 1 was "made up" into New Years Day by an act of
> > fiat; New Years Day used to be April 1.
>
> When and how did this happen?
Actually, there was no "act", that was hyperbole. The earliest
reference to a Januray 1 New Year I can find is the Roman Civil
Year. Later, the Catholic Church, which liked to line up the
calendar with its Holy Events, wanted sto see Christmas become
the start of the new year. But some later winter/early spring
feasts were a popular time for the people, so through much of
the dark ages, April 1 was the start of the New year.
When the establishment of the Gregorian Calnedar began to
take hold (which moved New Year's Day officially to Jan 1),
people foolish enought to still celebrate it on April 1
became known as "April's Fools".
The Gregorian Calendar was adopted tt different times in
different countries; I think Russia held out until the
early 20th Centurt. See
http://www.genfair.com/dates.htm
for more info.
Regards,
-dq
> I recently acquired (out of desperation) a DSI paper
> tape punch/reader on ePay (at a reasonable price, but
> not guaranteed to work). I cleaned it up, oiled it
> here and there, and after puzzling out the RS-232, got
> it running punching Mylar fine. To test it, I wrote a
> Windows program to test it out with; the program lets
> you type in a phrase, looks up the ASCII, and prints
> the letters out on the tape in a 7x5 matrix format,
> upper and lower case. I'm pretty sure that there were
> programs that ran on mainframes to do this sort of
> thing. Useless, but kind of fun - I made a banner for
> my museum with it. If anyone on this list has a
> punch, and admits to using Windows, ha ha, I can make
> this available.
On the CDC 6600, we had a Model 415 High-Speed Paper Tape
Reader/Punch. We had a locally-created control card we'd
use to control the disposition of output. In the standard
KRONOS system, it was DISPOSE, but we had so many devices
spread out over so many campuses that we wrote a card we
called ROUTE. Among other tasks, ROUTE provided the banner
pages for print jobs. A standard feature of the banner was
the job name, usually, your three initials plus a job ordinal.
When you'd sent output to the tape punch, it would punch
the job name at the start of the tape, in the manner you
describe.
Regards,
-dq
> On another note, CDC hardware that wasn't OEM'd from SGI seems relatively
> uncommon. There's one CDC workstation that was a re-badged Indigo, that's
> relatively common. It's the only CDC system I've seen for sale.
Fascinating... and of the CDC hardware I've seen for sale,
I've never seen anything that CDC didn't build themselves.
But then, all I've seen was 60s & 70s era stuff...
-dq
> Why on earth would Sun put a cool set of leds UNDERNEATH the cover? I mean,
> you might as well put it out there.
Apollo did this, too, but had cute little hinged doors covering
the LEDs' most everyone leaves them open, because one LED is
flashed by the system once per second, and is called "The
Heartbeat".
The Prime 2455 has four LEDs on its virtual control panel
board, three red and one green. No one I can find has a
clue what they all indicate...
-dq
Matthew Sell <msell(a)ontimesupport.com> wrote:
> Vacuum cleaning is much more "dangerous" for a PCB than washing it.
> Pete made a very good point, one I had forgotten, the static charge created
> by dust moving through an insulated (plastic) pipe can generate some
> obscene voltages.
This is not a problem with a little bit of planning.
One of my other hobbies is woodworking. Breathing in the
sawdust from many hardwoods is very unhealthy, so most
well financed wood shops have some kind of dust collection
systems. With flow rates of 200-1100 cfm and long runs of
plastic hose, a dust collector plus sawdust can be an
explosive situation. Thats why grounding kit are sold
separatly or included with most dust collectors. These
kits consist of a lenth of wire that runs down the hose
and metal clamps to clamp the wire to the hose at regular
intervals. These kits are available in most woodworking
stores.
Of course my favorite way to protect a circuit board from
static is to cover the solder side with aluminum foil,
lay it on conductive foam or a conductive plastic bag.
On a different subject:
I've also used aluminum foil to create a ground plane
to cut down on noise on some extender boards. I take two
pieces of cardboard the size of the PCB and wrap one with
aluminum foil. After making sure that none of the solder
joints will poke through the bare piece of cardboard, I
make a sandwich of the solder side of the PCB, the bare
piece of cardboard, and then the aluminum wrapped
cardboard. With this taped to the PCB, I solder a wire
>from the aluminum foil to ground on the PCB.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
> Sent: 17 December 2001 21:43
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Hardest to Find Classic Computers
>
> > The Digital Group systems get my vote. I've only *heard* of about 3,
> > since being on this list, which is a while. Maybe because no-one is
> > looking? I can't even imagine finding a full-up system, with several
> > CPU boards, Phi-deck tape drives, and matching cabinets for the
> > monitor, system unit, and tape drives, not to mention all
> the OS's and
> > other software... well, maybe I can imagine it...
>
> Yep, I'd agree here too. I have one complete system, and
> aside from that,
> the only other one I've ever seen was a kit sold at VCF 2.0 (or was it
> 3.0)?
>
Dammit - I was offered a Digital Group machine earlier this year and the
only thing that stopped me was the horrendous shipping cost from the US.
This thing had the (in)famous tape unit attached that contained either 4 or
6 drives; can't remember. I've still got the pix of it somewhere, and it
also spurred me on to do some digging with the result of finding Gus
Calabrese who was the founder (or one of them) of TDG in the first
place......
--
Adrian Graham, Corporate Microsystems Ltd
e: adrian.graham(a)corporatemicrosystems.com
w: www.corporatemicrosystems.com
w2: www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk (Online Computer Museum)