I'm still digging. I found more 550 stuff. I think this is everything
that came with the 550. Here's a chance for you 550 owner's to get the
whole set at one shot!
Original DS-DOS box and invoice.
Original Sanyo Easywriter ver 1.3 disk
Original Sanyo disk box with 550 dos ver 2.11 and BASIC 1.25, two
original Sanyo disk for InfoStar (set B disk 2 and 3 of 4; disks 1 and 4
are below), original Sanyo disk for DOS 1.25 and BASIC ver 1.1
Original Sanyo disk box with all three original disk of set A, WordStar
and CalcStar and a backup copy of DS-DOS.
Two card board dummy disks used to protect the floppy drives duing shipment.
Joe
>
>A few weeks ago we were talking about the Sanyo 550 series and someone
mentioned one of the alternates operating systems that supported 80 track
drives in the 550. I said that was DS-DOS by Michtron.
>
> Today I found an old Sanyo disk package with four disks for the 550. One
of them is DS DOS 2.11, one is InfoStar, one is MailMerge/SpellStar and the
other is a disk of misc utilities. The first three are original disks. In
additon, the InfoStar, MailMerge/SpellStar are Sanyo labeled disks that
came with the 550. If anyone wants them, trade me something I can use and
they're all your's.
>
> Joe
Does anyone have docs for this beastie? it's an apple-II on a card that
goes into an XT... or does anyone have any interest in it? it's been
sitting on my shelf for ~ 12 years now...
I have come across an Osborne model OCC1 Serial # 134033. This unit has the
300 baud modem. It also has 5 1/4 disk with it. (SuperCalc, WordStar,
Qbasic) The unit boots up and runs the software but after about 15 to 20
minutes it starts to overheat.(smoke)
My question is - What is the selling price for a unit like this and where
would be the best place to sell it?
Thanks for your help,
Steve Cochrane
Director of Information Technology
SGS Tool Company
PO Box 187
Munroe Falls, OH 44262
(330)686.4194
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
Yesterday I finally got a couple books I'd gotten on eBay a couple weeks
ago, obviously "VAXcluster Principles" is an interesting book, but I was
surprised how good of a book "The Digital Dictionary" is. I got the 2nd
Edition (the first was mainly internal use). It's a dictionary of all the
different terms that were in use around 1986. As such it contains info on
the PDP-10, PDP-11, and VAX, as well as DECmate's, Rainbows, and
Professionals. As well as the Apps, Languages, and OS's. Great book if
you want to know what a specific term or acronym means. Well worth picking
up if you are in to DEC stuff and can find a copy!
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Looking for info on the Dynalogic Hyperion, a "portable" DOS machine
manufactures around 1983. At least the one I have is 1983. it was designed
and initially built in Ottawa, Canada. Hyperion was acquired in about 1983
by Bytec, who was later bought by I think a Quebec company called Comterm.
Anyway, mine has stopped working: The machine still boots but no image is
displayed on its 7" diag screen. Hence I am looking for service info and/or
persons who have worked on the machine.
Any leads would be most appreciated.
Leo Butzel
Seattle, WA
lbutzel(a)home.com
> This is two years late, but the terminal the original poster describes
> sounds like an IST (model 1), a CRT-based CDC product, vintage about 1978.
> There was a later edition called the IST-II, also CDC. It had two 8" drives
> and a Z-80 CPU, as well as connectivity to CDC PLATO mainframe systems,
> either by dialup modem (1200 bps) or multiplexer.
Actually, I was the original poster; a reply to me mentioned the
terminal you're describing.
> The IST is not the oldest PLATO terminal, but it is the oldest that CDC
> manufactured, I suspect. Even my PLATO IV (Magnavox, 1971) is not the
> oldest, but only the first mass-produced machine. The earliest ones date to
> about 1961 and there are probably only two or three still in existence, if
> we're lucky enough to have that many. A precursor to these would be Norman
> Crowder's Auto-Tutor, vintage about 1958, which has characteristics very
> similar to the PLATO terminals (though it is not a computer terminal, it
> operates on filmstrip media), and PLATO's mechanisms are said to have been
> influenced by this machine.
It's one of the mid-70s Magnavox plasma displays I'm looking for...
Say, are you able to connect to NovaNET with the magnavox terminal? if
so, we should meet for a game of Empire or Avatar some time (although
I'm sure you'll wipe me out).... or maybe a more civilized game of chess...
Regards,
-doug quebbeman
Hello to all VAXenfolks,
i do have a problem with a VAX-11/730 that i have reconstructed
(cleaned,
resoldered, replaced cable, everything. Pictures on www.vaxcluster.de.
Yes,
i am a bit proud of it... But sorry for the bad web-page design!) over
the
last few months.
It is now willing to boot and tries to load it's microcode tape from the
TU-58 drives. I even have a microcode tape which looks like it could be
still readable.
But the TU-58's are so battered that i have not been able to read the
tape.
I have repaced the rubber rollers, but the read/write-heads look, ummm,
bad!
I have found somewhere some TU-58 simulator software for DOS which looks
like a promising alternative; i would place a mini-DOS-computer inside a
VT-102 and route some additional cables to the VAX and bee fine.
BUT: How do i get the contents of the microcode tape of the tape, into a
DOS file without access to a working TU-58?
Is someone on this list able to read the tape?
Has someone already made a tape image i could just use? I mean, i have
a original DEC tape, with serial number and all. I might even come up
with a license document, if i search long enough...
Any help would be greatly welcomed. This old lady is just to beautifull
to use it as an electric heater only...
Thank you
ms
--
Michael Schneider email: ms(a)silke.rt.schwaben.de
Germany http://www.vaxcluster.de
People disagree with me. I just ignore them.
(Linus Torvalds)
I am building a FPGA ( Field programmable gate array ) computer
in the style of the early computers that had a front panel and
TTY for I/O. While I don't have have a front panel working the
Hardware serial bootstrap does work on my prototype. Since I
have a few LOGIC cells left in my FPGA to play with I was
thinking adding a cassette interface. Does anybody know of
schematics on the web that I can get ideas from.
Ben Franchuk.
--
Standard Disclaimer : 97% speculation 2% bad grammar 1% facts.
"Pre-historic Cpu's" http://www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk
Now with schematics.
On Mon, 14 May 2001, George Leo Rachor Jr. wrote:
> Stay of execution on this Diablo 3200.....
>
> We have bought a bit of time as my wife has convinced them not to hack it
> up until I get to see this critter.
Cool!
> Obviously we have no software for the machine and I'm assuming you don't
> either.
Actually, I do. I got the original OS disks as well as a bunch of
floppies with various bits of accounting type software and useless data.
> The computer recycler has agreed not to remove the original components
> until it can be determined if the box is usuable in some rudimentry
> function as is. (They were going to gut the original components and
> replace the guts with something more modern).
Silly. Were they planning to use the same CRT and keyboard? I don't know
how. If all they wanted was a nice desk for a computer then maybe they
should go to Office Depot?
> Now the challenge is to find software that might boot the machine up.
I can make copies for you. Mine supposedly boots.
Here is a picture of mine.
http://www.siconic.com/computers/Diablo%203200.jpg
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
Here's a picture from 1966 of an IBM computer at the IBM computing center on
Manhattan (New York City, New York USA). The text for the photo says that
the computer is being used to make a payroll calculation.
Visible are 4 big-fridge-sized reel-reel tape devices, the console with
operator seated at it, and some other things in the background.
What's the computer model? Does anybody know who this guy (operator)
is/was?
Just a neat photo.
It's about a 150k jpg file at this url:
http://www.sover.net/~danm/computer_room.jpg
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
I saw one of these yesterday. It looks like a monitor with floppy
drive in the bottom, at the back was a plug for the power and another
labelled video. I could not see anyplace for a keyboard to be
attached.
Does anyone know anything about this machine?
Collector of Vintage Computers (www.ncf.ca/~ba600)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tothwolf [mailto:tothwolf@concentric.net]
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > Well, on one hand, yes, but on the other hand, I like my
> Indigo 2 Elan with
> > no texture memory just fine. I'm also considering trying
> I didn't know you had another SGI box ;)
Yep.
> A couple people I've known who ended up with old SGI gear thought they
> were going to create some kind of fancy animations with this kind of
> hardware, so I never know what to think now.
Depends on what you mean by "fancy animations." It will probably do better
out of the box than most new peesees depending on what you'd like to
animate. (and whether it requires texture memory, of course) Both of my
SGIs, for instance, have analog video in/out, which is a start. On the
other hand, you can't really do a good animation with anything "out of the
box." It usually takes a lot of strange stuff.
The graphical prowess of the machines is still something, though. For
instance, the ability of the machine to provide individual color-maps for
different windows on the screen, without the nasty palette-flashing that's
seen in xfree86 on an intel box (for example) when you try the same...
> Sounds like you at least have an original VGX chassis then.
> It is possible
> someone upgraded some of the boards, but the only way you'll
> be able to
> tell is to pull them and cross reference the part numbers.
I'm thinking about doing that. The label on top of the chassis actually
says "4D/440 VGX" or something to that effect.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I need an RM03, preferrably within sane driving distance of Peoria, IL.
Having a KS10 as a paperweight is absolutely no fun. I can trade PDP-11
stuff for one, I have all sorts of 11 kit that I'd be more than willing
to trade for KS10 stuff.
Also, if anyone has the 120V-AC plug that goes in a TM02, I am short one
of those as well - I have the 220 volt version (but the rest of the drive
is all 120 volt parts; Odd!)
Basically, I'm sick of using the KS10 as just emulation validation and I want
to get it running. ^_^
-------
Okay, in order to pose this question I have to come clean here and admit my
age:
Right around 1960 or '61 (I was five or six years old at the time) I was
given a toy computer. I suppose it was meant to represent a mainframe
(what else could it have been, given the era?) and there was a rectangular
(4 x 8? 5 X 7?) array of blinkenlights on the front of it. There was also
a tray in the front which accepted a small punched card. A set of these
cards came with the toy. Each card had a multiple-choice question printed
on it, as well as four answers to choose from, numbered A through D.
Additional card sets could be purchased separately.
When a card was placed into the tray and the tray was then closed, the
blinkenlights would display a "random" pattern for a couple of seconds
(always the same pattern) and then the array would display the correct
answer to the printed question, A B C or D. It didn't take long for me to
be able to read the holes in the cards, and I even "modified" a couple of
them so that the toy displayed an incorrect answer.
Does *anyone* remember this thing? It must have cost a few bucks back
then. What was it called?
Glen
0/0
Mark Crispin <MRC(a)CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote:
> Stacks are very useful, but they are not the solution to everything.
Absolutely agreed.
> One of the biggest deficiencies of C is its lack of co-routines, since
> it only has the stack style of subroutine calling. Yeah, I know about
> setjmp/longjmp, but those are one-way, not true co-routines.
Well, setjmp and longjmp are pretty powerful. see
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/opsys/threads/
for a machine-independent user-level thread package implemented in C using
setjmp and longjmp for control transfers between threads. It comes very
close to what a real coroutine afficianado would like. (Writing the
thread launch code in a machine independent way was murder.)
Curiously, the same thing can be done without longjmp()! I had a student
write me a thread package in Pascal once. All he needed was a mechanism
to convert pointers to integers and back again (easy enough in standard
Pascal, so long as it doesn't check variant records). Given this, his
code did essentially the same thing as my thread package.
> Of course, talking about co-routines to youngsters is likely to get
> their eyes to glaze over, since they won't have a clue as to what I'm
> talking about.
Indeed.
Doug Jones
jones(a)cs.uiowa.edu
Fred Cisin wrote
> In place of current accepted sloppy terminology,
> how many remember what they were called THEN?
Most of the engineers I work with have never heard of Amphenol or Cannon,
let alone "blue range" or "red range" (popular Cannon connectors)
It's a classic chicken and egg thing. Ampenol connectors were adopted as
a "standard" connector for Centronics printer, IEEE-488 and SCSI interface,
but are often mis-named. As I don't have an Amphenol catalogue to hand,
I'm afraid I can't tell you what Amphenol's designation is for this connector.
On the subject of D-sub connectors I've sometimes come across some with
metric threaded jackscrews instead of the usual UNF thread, or is it UNC ?
Chris Leyson
There's another Nile with 4 large racks of drives in a scrapyard in
Ottawa. I doesn't look like it's been there long. I should have spent
more time checking it out.
Likely Mike Kenzie could take a look at it and report back since I only
get to Ottawa occasionally.
Please see my post to follow with questions on the Pyramid 90x.
Dan Cohoe
> > > Does anyone know what sort of machine is in the car's
> > > onboard controller? A few pictures I've found make them
> > > look like PC104's. These machines are hitting zero value
> > > quickly and may not last 10 years unless picked up now.
> >
> > What car? They don't all use the same controllers, you know...
>
> Want a fuel injection "brain" from a 1968 VW Squareback?
Had Bosch come up with EFI already by 1968?
Every VW (and Audi & MB, etc) of that vintage that I've seen used
CIS, which was a purely mechanical system.
I have seen a 1969 Audi Super 90 (wagon) that had an aftermarket
Capacitative Discharge Ignition (CDI) System... by 1974, Audis
had those as stock, while CIS was still 1 year off...
My 1986 Audi 5000 CS Turbo Quattro uses a Motorola 6802-based
controller... very simple to upgrade, too.... ;-)
-dq
Sorry, a little overwhelmed by all this at the moment; will get back to ya.
Ethan, AIM65 stuff is ready to go.
John, still waiting to hear what you need for the Cromemcos.
Will be off 'Net till Monday.
mike
---------------Original Message-----------------
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Punch cards, punch & mag tapes (Toronto)
- --- "John R. Keys Jr." <jrkeys(a)concentric.net> wrote:
> Has anyone claimed these yet ? If not I will take them.
I tried to. Haven't heard back. Don't know who the lucky winner is,
but I suspect several people expressed interest.
- -ethan
Hi,
after a quick excursion in getting a PDP8/A up and running (as far
as that gets without any peripherals other than the programmers
console :-), I'm now back to the big toy. The 6460 is still waiting
to boot Ultrix.
Recap: it's up and running from VMS 7.2 or VMX 5.6 from RA90
disks through KDB50 and KDM70. I don't have any working IP
communication because the VMS 5.6 just doesn't have anything
and 7.2 has MULTINET which just refuses to run with the old
license key, nor with a cheat hack, nor with a hobbyist
license key. So I'm now down to transferring files through
modemspeed. (I could write a TK70 or 9-track tape at my
workplace, but that's a hassle by itself, so I keep that as
a last restort.) Luckily I have kermit on the VMS 7.2 so
I have a convenient yet slow way of transferring files.
I also have a boot tape from Isildur. That's Ultrix 4.1.
That version seems to not support the 6400, it boots up
until a certain point and then simply halts. I'm very
sure it is *not* a tape read error and that the boot
process fails somewhere after the VMB is loaded and probably
at the point where vmunix is started. I assume it just can't
get a hold of the console at that time to put out an error
message and just dies. Even the primary ultrixload will
dump an error message before it halts.
The more recent developments:
I also have an Ultrix-4.5 CD. But no CD ROM hooked to the
VAX and no other VAX (InfoServer) with CD ROM and so I
cannot boot that. I could possibly just write the CD ROM
image onto a disk verbatim and fingers crossed boot from
it. However, I cannot pump the 178 MB through the 9600
b/s line, or else I have to have that thing up for 2
days and two nights only for something that might just
plain not work.
Interestingly this CD is not an ISO file system but a
simple UFS written to the CD in 10 kB blocks. FreeBSD's
mount unfortunately cannot mount that. However, I just
dd'ed an image onto disk and vnconfig - mount form there.
It's read-only and disklabel doesn't make any sense out
of it, but I can read everything just fine.
Today's news:
So, I decided I make myself a bootable tape from the
reverse engineered Ultrix 4.1 boot tape and the new
4.5 files from the CD. The Ultrix boot tape comes with
a vmunix that apparently has some sort of standalone
memory root file system. Then it supposedly is able to
set up a disk and install a dump backup onto that disk.
That dump backup contains mkfs, disklabel, ifconfig, rcp,
uncompress, and tar, so I have everything to set myself
up even if the autoinstaller cannot deal with my hack.
The boot tape I could read from VMS.
$ MOUNT/FOREIGN/BLOCKSIZE=512/RECORD=512 MUC6
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.00
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.01
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.02 --> ERROR
$ DISMOUNT MUC6:
$ MOUNT/FOREIGN/BLOCK=10240/RECORD=10240 MUC6
$ SET MAGTAPE /SKIP=FILE:2
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.02
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.03
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.04
$ COPY MUC6: FILE.05
...
and so on. It's got some 40 or so files on it. What there
files are we are being told from the ultrixload.c source
code.
FILE.00 is the ultrixload image, about 18 kB in size.
Ultrixload is said to load either vmb.exe or a
standalone kernel from a non-file structured device.
The layout of the boot device is descibed as:
FILE.00 - ultrixload
FILE.01 - a combo consisting of
- descriptor block 1 512 byte block
- vmb.exe (optional)
- vmunix (compressed if not a TK50)
This magic descriptor block is described as:
struct desc {
union {
char pad[512];
struct {
struct exec x; /* a.out image header */
int nblks; /* num of 512 byte blocks on medium */
int vmbblks; /* size of VMB in 512 byte blocks */
int compressed; /* 1 = compressed, 0 = not compressed */
} d
} un
};
By loading the initial portions of the other files down
to my BSD system and using file and stuff, I figured the
other files:
FILE.02 - the ROOT file system dump
FILE.03 - an uncompressed tar of the instctl files (on the CD)
FILE.04 - a compressed tar that is called ULTBASE450 on the CD
FILE.05 - a compressed tar that is called ULTBIN450 on the CD
...
and so on. The instctl tar begins with a file called ULT.image
and that is just a list of files beginning with ROOT, ULTBASE,
ULTBIN, that apparently correspond with the files on the tape
in that order.
So, my plan is to fiddle with files 0 and 1 only and keep the
rest, as it should be compatible with the 4.5 kernel. That
reduces the amount of data to transfer tremendously.
Quickly I found that I have no ultrixload on the CD, so the
old version will have to do. As I have strong indication that
that works, I can leave it at that.
Remains to work on file 1, that funny combo of descriptor,
vmb.exe and vmunix. The tar file 4 (ULTBASE) contains a
vmb.exe as well and so I could compare the two files that
came with ultrix 4.1 and 4.5 respectively. They were both
the same size and actually both the same. I successfully
extracted another exact copy of vmb.exe using
dd if=file.01 bs=512 of=vmb.exe skip=1 count=86
So, whatever VMB.EXE is for (sounds like a VMS boot block),
I can reuse the old one. Given that I have a standalone vmunix,
all I'd need to do is cut and paste that somewhere after
block 86 to the end of file 1 with a few cat and dd operations.
But here the problem starts. I cannot interpret the descriptor
block very well. It tells me that the VMB.EXE is 86 blocks
in size and that is exactly 44032 bytes, that corresponds
with the actual size of the vmb.exe file from the tar archives.
Good, but apparently the vmunix is not a complete piece.
Apparently that descriptor block's a.out header slot actually
holds the a.out header from the vmunix file and the vmunix
file is right after the vmb.exe without it's a.out header.
I also see a lot of 0 data in that region. So apparently I
will have to fiddle with that a.out header and need to know
just where to cut vmunix. That is a problem.
I will try to figure that out somehow. My hunch is that the
a.out block (which I haven't been fiddling with since I
ported Kyoto Common Lisp to 386/BSD 0.1) allows for the
executable to actually have some other stuff like that vmb.exe
before the actual start of the executable image. I have no
idea though what the purpose of this stupid vmb.exe is.
All in all I'm optimistic. I'd love to make a boot tape with
4.5 Ultrix that I could then share with my friends (that
is you) who also want to get their 6400s converted to Unix.
As always I'd be thankful for any helpful ideas you might
have.
regards,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
------Original Message------
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com>
--- Bill Gunshannon <bill(a)cs.scranton.edu> wrote:
> Your thinking of the Heath H11 which was in fact an LSI-11/02. But it had
It shipped as an LSI-11/03 CPU and heath made memory and IO.
My H-11 came with a KDF-11 CPU (11/23), but I don't know if it was shipped
that way or if my boss (who bought it new) upgraded it himself.
Yep, never shipped with 11/23 (KDF-11A). It was discontinued
by then if anything.
I have a couple of the Heath serial cards (one unsoldered!), the H-27
disk controller, the 8" floppies and a pile of misc DEC cards (memory,
BDV-11 boot card, etc).
The heath seriial card was a fairly flexible card copared to the usual DEC DL-11.
to debug the H-27 (he never used it). Except for the monsterous holes he blew in the side to mount additional fans, and the holes in the front he added for external console baud rate switches, it resembles its original
form once again.
The fans and switches were a common mod and handy too.
Allison
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
--probably off topic...
I am not sure of the age of the board but
Adaptec seems to think it's not supportable
any more... :^(
Anybody have DOS ASPI drivers for the
ADAPTEC AHA-1542CF??
Tis an ISA scsi card with floppy attach
and I have it in a 486 machine
----------------------------------
The machine seems to be a 486dx in a "lunchbox"
style case with color lcd. looks like a normal
motherboard is inside..
goes by the name of PCIII, with no other markings
as to MFG.
Any one know anything about this?
Hi,
I'm ripping my hair out over VMS (as usual). I have a little
magic file that I need to transfer from PC to VAX. And
kermit on both ends. I thought I knew how to use kermit,
but no matter what I do, the file will never work as an
executable on the VAX. It always complains about a corrupt
descriptor block and it comes up too long. The file is
exactly 2048 bytes long and when I send it it comes up as
5/6 blocks with DIR/SIZE=ALL. That is one block too many,
isn't it?
The funny thing is, when I do a round trip with kermit
PC -put-> VAX -get-> PC, I get two identical files on the
PC. But when I do VAX -get-> PC -put-> VAX of a working
.EXE file on the VAX, I end up with a broken copy (same
error.) So, what can I do?
I have SET FILE TYPE BINARY on both sides.
I'm so sorry for bothering you with my VMS ignorance, I
greatly appreciate your patience and help.
regards
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
I'm wanting to buy a Tiger Learning Computer from anyone who may have one
they don't want. This was the kid computer released during Christmas of
1996 but only sold in limited numbers in the JC Penney 1996 Christmas
catalog. It was Apple ][ compatible--it basically had enhanced Apple //e
ROMs and used Flash ROM cards as an emulated Disk ][ drive. It had
Appleworks built-in. Very nifty.
I'm also open to trades. Any got one?
This is my biggest want currently.
:)
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *