test-drb October 1998

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

175 participants
1141 discussions

by mbg＠world.std.com

>As this forum is based upon Classic Computers I have a >theoretical question for you all. >Which do you prefer, the original system or an emulation? For me, the real machine is more important. An emulation is a poor replacement (especially if it has to run under Microsoft-anything). But with some hardware being in very short quantity, an emulator can fulfill a need. I'm in the process of working on a pdp-10 emulator, but that is not to say that I would turn down real hardware... my only problem right now is lack of space. I definitely could not handle a KA, KI or KL... but a KS? Good possibiliy... the disks are another problem, however. Megan Gentry Former RT-11 Developer +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com | | Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com | | Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' | | 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ | | Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler | | (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg | +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+

25 years, 9 months

Tops-20 and ^T

by pechter＠shell.monmouth.com

BSD derived boxes have the ^T status available... see below from my Freebsd 2.2.7 box (AMD 586/133) Script started on Tue Oct 20 08:42:46 1998 #134 i4got:/home/pechter>^T load: 0.22 cmd: ksh 15420 [ttyin] 0.03u 0.06s 0% 472k Script done on Tue Oct 20 08:42:54 1998 Bill (wishing for both Tops-20 and Vax/Vms on my pc) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bill and/or Carolyn Pechter | pechter(a)shell.monmouth.com | | Bill Gates is a Persian cat and a monocle away from being a villain in | | a James Bond movie -- Dennis Miller | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

25 years, 9 months

Political and off-topic (was Re: discrete transistors)

by franke＠sbs.de

>> terminals...sometimes I wish capitalism was never invented... > Well, since only essentially capitalist countries have ever invented > useful products of any kind and computers are useful... Hmm so where you put in war time Germany ? It was organized more like the later SU but the same time a whole lot of inventions and 'fist' things hapened ? > Of course, the US is more socialist every week since 1933. Geeee - come on - its maybe becoming more and more fuzzy, but socialism is way, way the other direction. Gruss H. (And to come on topic again: did you know that they had some real neat computers in the east before they switched to strict cloning in the 80's ?) -- Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut HRK

25 years, 9 months

Need Info on DEC 11/84 Board, M8190

by franke＠sbs.de

>>> BTW, would you say 'kilobyte' is a misnomer? THe number it >>>signifies isn't 10^3, it's 2^10. For a feeble attempt to get back on >>>topic: was kilobyte always accepted as 1024 bytes? >> What drives me crazy are the marketroids who round-up twice >> in order to inflate the capacity of hard drives. > What annoys me is the 1.44Mbyte floppy disk. The only way to get that > capacitiy is to define 1Mbyte = 1000*1024 Bytes. Ugh! > The famous 65K memory chips/boards of years gone by grated on me as well > (they were, of course 64K boards with 65536 locations). Just remember the Ataris: 64XL, 130XL, ST260, ST520, ST1040 :)) Gruss H. -- Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut HRK

25 years, 9 months

IBM AT Piggyback Memory

by franke＠sbs.de

>> In rummage through the dark recesses of my garage (too densly packed to let >> in light) I again ran across an IBM AT motherboard that used the piggyback >> memory chips. Were there any other computers that used these things? > The Apple /// 128K memory board used 32 pieces of standard 16K DRAM, and > 16 pieces of 32K (stacked 16K) DRAMs. > Several TI calculators including the TI-58 and TI-59 use stacked DIPs for > RAM. > The HP-41CX calculator uses stacked DIPs for ROM and RAM. The first Atari ST520+ and 260+ used stacked chips. Atari decided short before delivering the first units that they had to double the RAM size (Never woundered why the 260+ had 512K and the 520+ had 1Meg ? 260 -> 260 decimal kBytes and 520 -> 520 decimal kBytes, both numers are rounded in favour for the marketing .) Ther have also been real 260s and 520s with 256K and 512K. Gruss H. -- Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut HRK

25 years, 9 months

discrete transistors

by franke＠sbs.de

> < It's certainly *possible* to add intelligent I/O channels to an x86 mach > The hottest machine I've played with was a hacked xerox XP12 laser printer > controller. It was a 8mhz 8086 and a 8089(IOP). It could beat any 8086 > system cold (using s100 and multibus systems as standard). Later I would > see a 8086 multibus system with two 8089s running CPM-86 and it was far > faster than the then new AT. Thats it - I still go mad when people are ranting about the x86 architecture (kind of popular) but they never tried to understand the features, or they never seen the whole family. In fact, Intel designed the 86 as part of an chipset in a very mainframe like way - A general purpose CPU: 8086, a specialized floating point add on: 8087 and a versitale IOC: 8089. A structure as found on most mainframe at this time (Remember, also IBM offered their customers to get specialized add ons to improve floating point performance on the /370). Since IBM used only the CPU and FPU, the actual PC design is exact like a Mainframe without an IOC: Just painfull slow. Gruss H. P.S.: The hate-segmentation-rantig against the x86 also drives me mad - the segmentation sceme used is a very good compromise between usability and performance. Loosing up to 15 Bytes per segment isn't realy a drawback compared to granularities of 4 or 8K today ... -- Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut HRK

25 years, 9 months

UK VCF (Was: Re: Any *really* homebrewing going on?)

by JRichardson＠softwright.co.uk

>>> Oh well. It would have been an interesting idea. well I'd be interested, but the big problem's transport at the moment. Give me a couple of months and then ask again :) >> > Yeah, and given the geographic spread of the people that did reply, even >>a >> > pub meet would be out of the question. >> >> Jep, just for 3 hours would be a bit short - I'll think >> you have to change your horrible pub opening hours. well rumour has it that they might be changing. At the moment all you need to do is find a good pub with a decent landlord who isn't bothered about closing at the official times. It's not difficult! cheers Jules

25 years, 9 months

discrete transistors

by allisonp＠world.std.com

< performance on the /370). Since IBM used only the CPU and FPU, < the actual PC design is exact like a Mainframe without an IOC: < Just painfull slow. My pet peve is the IBM PC when launched was clocked at a rather poor 4.77mhz when most of the s100, multibus and generally everyone else that went with 16bits were looking for 8mhz or faster if possible. It saved a few dollars but not enough. At least DEC had a z80 in there to also do IO (instead of the IOC). < P.S.: The hate-segmentation-rantig against the x86 also drives < me mad - the segmentation sceme used is a very good compromise < between usability and performance. Loosing up to 15 Bytes < per segment isn't realy a drawback compared to granularities < of 4 or 8K today ... To me segmentation was just another bag on the side to get 16bits to address more. The other half is that MMU granularity makes sense for its time but with modern OSs eating megabytes for the kernel Even segments don't allow enough. Allison

25 years, 9 months

Belly laugh on eBay

by franke＠sbs.de

>> This item description on eBay says it all: >> 36111353 Collectible IBM PS/1 Type 2011 >> BWAHAHAHAHA! >> Kai > Sorry to differ, but from a collectors point of view the 2011 is > unique. I don't know how rare it is but it is certainly rarer than the 5150. Yep, collectors are more different then dogs and cats.... > The item offered is of course useless because the power supply is in the > monitor unit. IBM calls it a 286 work station and it functions fine in that > capacity with a good display. And IBM sold tonns of them - at least over here. Gruss H. -- Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut HRK

25 years, 9 months

128k Mac Schematic needed

by SUPRDAVE＠aol.com

well, i have no schematics, but i do have a spare power supply board if anyone needs it. In a message dated 10/17/98 9:45:31 PM US Eastern Standard Time, nerdware(a)laidbak.com writes: > My 128k Mac went south on me. When I first got it a year ago, it turned on > and > the screen came up and asked for a floppy. Not having a system disk that old, > I > just put it in storage until I came across one. > > Needless to say, next time I turned it on the floppy made funny noises and > kept spitting the disk out and no video. > > Does anyone have a schematic for the little beast so I can get it cooking > again? If I have to, I can use my Mac Plus for my history presentations, but > I > would rather use the original, if possible.

25 years, 9 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb October 1998