The CPU *REFUSES* to go to the run state when powered on.
Both BAs come on, the DEC power bus is connected.
I have the cable correct, it's not twisted...
What did I do?
Current config:
+------+ +------+
| BA #1| | BA #2|
| [1] ======= [2] |
+------+ +------+
[1] CPU backplane only
[2] DD11-CK with the UDA in it.
The terminator is in BA #2
You know, I always hate these moral dilemmas...
In the last few days the collection received an AT&T UNIX PC (aka 7300,
3b1) in extremely good condition. It arrived with all of the original
docs, software, and mouse. The docs were unwrapped , and the mouse was in
its original foam packing. "Kind of nice when someone packs things away
properly" I thought.
Well, its been a bit busy around the garage the last couple of weeks, so I
put the unit and its associated stuff on the shelf and covered it up for a
time.
Last night, while I was working on a notebook (yes, one of those 'modern'
things) for one of my wife's friends, I decided to have another look at the
UNIX PC while I was waiting for a disk scan to finish...
Found a spot for it on the bench, made a cursory check of the unit (nothing
loose, nothing rattling...) and powered it up. It hummed and beeped
happily and started drawing little boxes on the screen as I recalled it
doing when it was starting up...
However, about 3-4 minutes and 4-5 lines of little boxes later, it starts
to dawn on me that it should not be taking quite this long to get a prompt
of some kind. So, I move the keyboard to have a look at the floppy drive
(it hides behind the keyboard you see) and sure enough the machine is
looking for a floppy.
Fine... so, I grab the binder containing the software distribution, open it
up...
All of the disks are still sealed! At this point it starts to dawn on me,
that this machine has never been run! A comment flashes back to mind; made
by the person who gave me the machine... "My father bought it for his
company, read the manuals and realized that he had no idea what he was
doing..."
I find myself wondering... Back around 1985 when this thing was released
(and about $10k+), who could have afforded to buy one of these things, open
the manuals, decide that they were in over their heads, and just put it on
the shelf without even loading the software??? EEK!
And so, the dilemma... do I open the disks and crank this critter up? Or
just pack it all away as another classic 'artifact'? (or leave it until I
have a fair amount of time to spend with it)
No flame wars please, just the random philosophical question...
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
<Could someone tell me what exactly "core memory" is? From mentions of
Core memory. A system using metal or ferrite(magnetic) material to store
data using magnetization. One core, one bit. The direction of magnetic
field is key to determining the data stored.
<Acoustic delay line? What is that?
The principle is that sound(mechanical vibration) moves slower than
elctrons. Data, bit are translated from voltages or current to using a
transducer resulting mechanical vibration and transmitted through
a medium to a like mercury or water to a like transducer where the
vibrations are translated back to data. The best example is you see
lightening immediately, but sound in air travels about 1100 feet per second.
If you time from the flash to the sound you can calculate how far. In
solids and liquids sound travels faster but still far slower than the speed
of light. So if you put a vibration in to a medium large enough in length
there is time before it comes out. So it's possible to put strings of bits
in if the medium chosen is long enough as the first one is comming out the
last one is in. If you circulate these(with amplification) you now have a
memory that is serial in nature and can store information.
The name comes from the fact that the first data in will have a finite
time delay before it arrives at the other side. The longer the time the
more data can transit the space and the greater the storage. There are
mechanical and other considerations that limit things.
Allison
At 07:22 PM 11/19/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Okay... I started all this stuff... and I'll end it... it *was* a mistake....
>but now, at least we know that until something BIG happens, the 10 yr.
definition
Or until somebody else new comes along. 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
OK. Now the 44 starts, and I can talk to ODT. I removed all the boards &
backplanes except the CPU. There are 2 free preiph slots on the CPU,
it's got 1.5M RAM. Now I have to add a second backplane for the DZs and
the UDA50. So, I have a new DD11-CK. Will that go in a 44?
> > > It would be even better if it
> > > were easy to require that the subscriber afirm that the FAQ had been
> > > read in return mail before the subscription actually started.
> >
> > It helps that there is a bit at the bottom of the welcome message
> > pointing out that anyone who does not prove that they have read that
far
> > and reply will not have their subscription completed. (If this is
> > actually enforced)
>
> Hmmm. Perhaps there should be a quiz during the subscription process
> whereby you are asked 10 questions that you will only know the answer to
> if you've read the FAQ.
It seems to me that I'd rather put up with a few "dumb" questions --
something I get all the time, in my computer business) than alienate, or
scare away new users by quizzing on the FAQ.
People were patient and gentle with me when I was starting out, and freely
shared their knowledge with me without censure. Let's give the new people a
break -- encourage the reading of the FAQ, certainly, but be patient with
silly mistakes.
I moved the parts back to Tek-star. Now to start reassembling the
beast... It's now in 2 places at once:
My house
and here.
A week ago, it was in 5 places at once: My house, here, SSI, my car, and
Jeff's house.
I'll bring the BAs in and I can get to work!
Could someone tell me what exactly "core memory" is? From mentions of
ferrite, I am guessing it was some kind of magnetic thing, but what exactly?
Acoustic delay line? What is that?
>Any other thoughts on case designs? I still think the Lisa was beautiful,
>and I'll have to check out the 3b1.
I have to agree about the Lisa - there is just something about her lines
which really appeals to me. :) The Atari 400 is also a faviourite, as it
has the weird science-fiction look. But the best (apart from the Lisa)
would have to be the Mac 128 and Apple IIc - both are very much Steve Jobs'
concept of what a computer should be, and although I don't agree with him
they nevertheless have a fine design concept.
If only I have a NextCube - that is one of the two computers I most want in
the world (the other being a Sinclair ZX81).
Adam.