There are two places I'd check. The manual for the Royal McBee LGP-30 and
the book Computer Structures: Readings and Examples by G Bell et al.
Bill
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Grif via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
I wonder how the late generation paging disks (fixed head per track) like
DG used in the 80's compared?
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Koning via cctalk <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
Sent: May 10, 2018 7:29 AM
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <
cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
Subject: how fast were drum memories?
Drums were used as main memory in a number of early computers, and as
secondary
memory for a while longer. I wonder how fast real ones (actually
constructed) managed to be.
What prompted this question is reading an interesting document:
https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/9603 (in Dutch), "Principles of electronic
calculating machines, course notes February 1948" by Prof. A. van
Wijngaarden at the Mathematical Center (now CWI) in Amsterdam. It's quite
a fascinating short introduction into computing technology of that era.
(One comment in the intro: "The field is new. At the moment, the Eniac is
the only working machine..." -- probably not quite accurate given some
classified machines, but not too far wrong.)
The section on main memory describes a bunch of different technoly
possibilities,
one of them drum memory. He writes that a drum of 8 cm
diameter (a bit over 3 inches) and "a couple of decimeters height" could
hold maybe 100k bits, with a track pitch of "a few millimeters". So far so
good. He goes on to suggest that such a drum might spin at 1000
revolutions per second, i.e., 60,000 rpm. That seems amazingly high. I
could see it being physically possible for a drum of only 40 mm radius, but
it sure doesn't sound easy. It's a good goal to strive for given that the
logic, even in the days of vacuum tubes, can run at cycle times of just a
couple of microseconds. As one more way to speed things up he suggests
having multiple rows of read/write heads, where the addressed word would be
picked up by whichever head sees it soonest. 10 rows and 60k rpm would
give you 50 microseconds average access time which "even for a parallel
computer would be a very attractive number". (Pages 17-18)
I'm wondering what the reality of fast drum memories looked like, and
whether
anyone came even close to these numbers. Also, am I right in
thinking they are at least in principle achievable? I know I could run the
stress numbers, but haven't done so.
paul