31 May
2009
31 May
'09
1 p.m.
Just got a new mini-ITX motherboard and need a case. So I have begun
looking about the house and found a PC Jr in the closet. I think this might
be the one with the memory problem. I do have another. So how big of sin
would it be to gut it and install a mini-ITX motherboard? I do hate to
damage vintage hardware, but is it really all that rare?
Max
31 May
31 May
1:04 p.m.
Just got a new mini-ITX motherboard and need a case.
So I have begun
looking about the house and found a PC Jr in the closet. I think this might
be the one with the memory problem. I do have another. So how big of sin
would it be to gut it and install a mini-ITX motherboard? I do hate to
damage vintage hardware, but is it really all that rare?
You, sir, are going to hell.
Peanuts are not that rare, but why gut one?
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Sometimes Dilbert is so true, it's scary. -- Mike Jacobs -------------------
2:05 p.m.
Keith Froedge wrote:
Just got a new mini-ITX motherboard and need a case.
So I have begun
looking about the house and found a PC Jr in the closet. I think this might
be the one with the memory problem. I do have another. So how big of sin
would it be to gut it and install a mini-ITX motherboard? I do hate to
damage vintage hardware, but is it really all that rare?
As much as I love my peanut collection, they are not totally that rare.
If you have one that isn't functional, we (the few people who love and
collect PCjrs) would forgive you for turning one into a modern computer.
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
2:11 p.m.
At 4:05 PM -0500 5/31/09, Jim Leonard wrote:
As much as I love my peanut collection, they are not
totally that
rare. If you have one that isn't functional, we (the few people who
love and collect PCjrs) would forgive you for turning one into a
modern computer.
I think that's the best metric for destroying something for a
Mini-ITX case. It's also the one I'm using, as I would like to house
a board in 40's Radio.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
4:52 p.m.
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At 4:05 PM -0500 5/31/09, Jim Leonard wrote:
The local Goodwill has a 40s console radio sans radio for $40 or so. It's
just a wooden shell.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
As much as I love my peanut collection, they are
not totally that rare. If
you have one that isn't functional, we (the few people who love and collect
PCjrs) would forgive you for turning one into a modern computer.
I think that's the best metric for destroying something for a Mini-ITX
case. It's also the one I'm using, as I would like to house a board in
40's Radio. 
3:12 p.m.
Keith Froedge wrote:
Just got a new mini-ITX motherboard and need a case.
So I have begun
looking about the house and found a PC Jr in the closet. I think this might
be the one with the memory problem. I do have another. So how big of sin
would it be to gut it and install a mini-ITX motherboard? I do hate to
damage vintage hardware, but is it really all that rare?
Max
You will burn in hell ..
:-)
#### ###### ## ## ###### #### ##
## ## ## ### ### ## ## ## ##
## ## ## ####### ## ## ## ## ## ###
## ##### ####### ##### ## ## ### ##
## ## ## ## # ## ## ## ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
#### ###### ## ## #### #### ## ## ####
####
_____________________________________________________________
| | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||||| | +-------------------+ | | | |
| ||||||||||||||||| | | ==| +---+ | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||||| | | --|---| |------ | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||||| | | +---+ | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||||| | +-------------------+ | | | |
| ||||||||||||||||| [] | +---------+---------+ | | | |
| | |_________|_________| | | | |
|________________________+________________________|_|___|___|
Mike
5690
days inactive
5690
days old
5 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
devilanse＠gmail.com -
dgriffi＠cs.csubak.edu -
healyzh＠aracnet.com -
mbbrutman-cctalk＠brutman.com -
spectre＠floodgap.com -
trixter＠oldskool.org