Hi,
....though COS rings a bell, so presumably that entire
bootrom
including Front Panel was called COS....
I'm not sure....it's been a while.
I do recall though that at one point we had a pair of cassette recorders
running on the machine, COS had PET like support for them.
....even though we actually justed booted 31K (and
later, 56K!)
builds of CP/M....
Our original cassette based system I think had just 16K of RAM.
All the CP/M based machines were 32K machines....apart from one which had
been mistakenly shipped with 64K. :-)
....Later on, we bought two 480Zs (in black, to match)
and a
Memotech MTX512.
Never seen the 480Z (except for photos).
Those Memotechs were nifty machines. I used to have a pair of 512s and a 500
with the SDX disc upgrade.
I wish I'd kept that one now, I've only ever seen the FDX mentioned in the
Memotech literature - never the SDX. It was a unit that attached the the
"cartridge" port on the left of the machine (same shape as the machine,
about 3" wide) and had a BBC like drive attached via a ribbon cable.
At first, two maths teachers were conscripted into
teaching
'O' level Computer Studies....
Same at our school.
....which involved talking about core memory and
learning BASIC....
Luckily ours were a bit more knowledgable....that said the emphasis was
still on stuff like core memory etc since that's what was on the exam paper.
My school only taught Computer Studies for four years,
because
teaching about computers was quickly displaced by learning about
computers in other subjects....
I think at my old school the computer science stuff was taken over by the
science department after I left. Then later on they created a "computing"
department.
CESIL, Computer Education in Schools Instructional
Language.
CESIL was hilarious. We had an interpreter for it, written in
BASIC so that it ran many times more slowly than BASIC....
The one we had was a stand alone interpreter, it booted from cassette just
like BASIC did.
....despite looking like assembler, with instructions
like JIZERO....
I kind of liked it. Although it was too simple to be of any real long term
use it was interesting....
But then I'm biased, I know a bunch of high level languages, but I've always
been an assembly language programmer by choice.
Absolutely. Our assembler only took 8080 mnemonics, so
I continued
using the Front Panel and DATA statements in BASIC.
That'll have been the standard CP/M assembler, we had ZASM too which
accepted Z80 mnemonics (thank goodness, I've never liked Intel's assembly
language syntax).
TTFN - Pete.
--
Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
peter.pachla(a)wintermute.org.uk |
www.wintermute.org.uk
--