On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 UberTechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
Yea. I think some of thier 486dlc chips also bore
that little emblem.
Don't worry. I used to run OS/2 on an AMD486 and on the 486dlc. The
processors are completely compatible with Intel's as far as I've been able
to see.
Well, I never had problems with the 486 AMD & Cyrix, and that dlc flat
smoked a comparable Intel 486, but I've had both AMD K-6 and Cyrix 686
boxes in the 166-200mHz class, and they did not fare well with Windows.
Constant lockups and the occasional hard freeze. I'm quite sure it
wasn't a hardware issue, such as thermal problems, because Linux ran
just fine on all of them.
Having said all that, I'm convinced that the IBM/Cyrix 686 bot its bad
rap mostly from third-rate integrators and $4 HS/fan combos. I charged a
BUNCH of $50-$75 service call to pop the heatsink, spread some thermal
paste, and put the cover back on.
Doc
In <S.0000001761(a)mythtech.net>et>, on 12/14/01
at 04:06 PM, Chris <mythtech(a)Mac.com> said:
Ugh... this takes the cake.
I was pulling apart a 486 logic board, and I
pulled the heat sink off the
chip... to be greated with an AMD 486 chip with "Made for Microsoft
Windows" and the Windows logo stamped on it.
What... no other OS is supposed to use an intel
compatible processor?!? I
am sure anyone that bought this chip to use with any other OS probably
paid an MS tax because of that stamp!
Just for that, I think I might see if I can get my
Intel build of
Rhapsody to install on it.
Ok, so it isn't 10 years or older, but at
least you people can understand
the pain.
-c