3 Mar
2008
3 Mar
'08
8:44 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
Here is an odd question for everyone. In a printed
article, which
would be more accurate? "Apple ][", "Apple II", or "Apple
2"
Zane
I sense an impending flame war. Everyone uses every kind of moniker
for the A2 platform.
I personally use mostly "Apple II", plus "Apple //". There's
the
Apple //, the Apple II Plus (II+), Apple IIe, the Apple IIc (and IIc
Plus or IIc+), and the Apple IIgs.
Josef
3 Mar
3 Mar
9:29 a.m.
At 10:44 AM -0600 3/3/08, Josef Chessor wrote:
I sense an impending flame war.
I really hope not. I now have the info I needed. My thanks to you both.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
12:58 p.m.
Here is an odd
question for everyone. In a printed article, which
would be more accurate? "Apple ][", "Apple II", or "Apple
2"
I sense an impending flame war. Everyone uses every kind of moniker
for the A2 platform.
I personally use mostly "Apple II", plus "Apple //". There's
the
Apple //, the Apple II Plus (II+), Apple IIe, the Apple IIc (and IIc
Plus or IIc+), and the Apple IIgs. 
2:13 p.m.
Apple //, the
Apple II Plus (II+), Apple IIe, the Apple IIc (and IIc
Plus or IIc+), and the Apple IIgs.
The machine is the Apple II (roman numerals), or Apple 2. The ][ (and
///) were cute FONT variants of the roman numberals.
6041
days inactive
6041
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
cisin＠xenosoft.com -
geneb＠deltasoft.com -
healyzh＠aracnet.com -
josefcub＠gmail.com