From: Guy Sotomayor
the way that it works is that 144 bits will be shifted
out and then
all latched at once.
Ah. That will limit the rate at which you can update the lights, though,
right? I mean, you won't (be able to) update the panel after every word, will
you?
Although I suppose even if you only do it after each transfer, that's
probably still going to give much the same visual effect.
Will you be grouping them in 3's, with slightly
larger gaps between
each group of 3? That would really maximize the ability to look just
like the old RF11 display panel.
No, it'll be just like the DEC panels. All of the
LEDs (in this case)
will be evenly spaced. The overlay masked the bulbs that weren't used.
Ah, I was faked out by the illustration (not a picture, alas!) in the RF11
manual, it looked like they were grouped.
I wasn't sure if the larger spaces between various fields were just bulbs
they didn't wire up, or if they were also masked by the overlay; I just
looked at some of my KA-11 overlays (now _there's_ a machine with blinking
lights! :-), and they are indeed blanked in the overlay, so I would
guess/asssume they did the same on the RF11.
From: Bob Rosenbloom
I have an indicator panel that's labeled
"Peripheral Indicator Panel
5406458A"
No overlays or anything to indicate what it was used for. Is it
possibly the disk indicator panel?
That sure looks like it. Too bad you don't have the overlay...
Now that I think about it, I wonder if that panel was originally used on the
KA? The 36 bits are certainly suggestive... I'll have to see if I can find a
picture of the disk/tape controller display panel from the KA and see if that
could have been it.
Noel