The only think I can think of that is "special" about
Tek probes is the 1X/10X switch grounds the small ring
around the BNC connector, so that the unit will switch
and the appropriate 1x/10x lamps will light
automatically. Other good quality probes rated to the
response of the scopes work fine other than that
feature.
--- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Tony Duell wrote:
> RM-xxx is the Rack Mount version of the xxx. So
the RM503 is a rackmount
> 503 (IIRC, that one doesn't take
plug-ins at
all), the RM561 is a
> rackmount 561 (later, smaller 500 series,
taking
plug-ins for both X and
Y).
Right, I knew about the RM-xxx meaning rackmount,
but I wondered if the
500 series might have shared a common design.
Some did. The 53x, 54x, and (most of) 55x have
similarities in mechanical
construciton (and circuitry to some extent). The 53x
were the
low-bandwidth models and the 55x dual beam, of
course. All took the same
plug-ins.
The 58x (100MHz bandwidth, with a beautiful CRT with
distributed
deflection plates and a built-in delay line) were
similar but took
different, higher-bandwidth plug-ins. You could use
the plug-ins from the
53x, etc if you had a type 81 adpater between the
plug-in and the 'scope.
The above series had plug-in Y preamplifiers, but in
general the
timebased (and X deflection system) was built into
the 'scope. There are
certainly 2 exceptions to that -- the 536 took 2
'normal' plug-ins (one
for each of X and Y -- there was a thing called a
type T which was a
timebase unit) and the 555 has plug-in timebases,
but they're special
modules, not interchangeable with anything else. The
only reason they
were plug-ins was to allow access for repairs,
really.
The 56x were the odd ones. The insturments
(non-rack-mount versions) were
a lot smaller than the other series. The plug-ins
were totally different,
and all 'scopes took plug-ins for X and Y.
> If the brightness control section is still good,
is there any reason not
> to bypass the switch on the back of it, and
just
use an external
> double-pole switch in series with the mains
input? It would at least
give you
a working 'scope...
Thats kinda how I found it when I got it...except
that the wire that was
used to jumper the switch had obviously gotten
very hot. Since the wire
had been tack soldered across the terminals, one
side seems to have acted
like a fuse. I imagine the power switch was
probably damaged due to the
same problem. Oh, and I found that someone had
installed a much higher
rated fuse in the scope than should have been
installed... Needless to
say, there is something else that needs to be
fixed in the 'scope too :)
Hmm.. Why do idiots persist in over-rating fuses
when they blow???
OK, you've probably got a serious short somewhere in
the PSU section. A
smoothing capacitor if you're lucky, shorted turns
on the transformer if
you're not. Tekky used to claim that these
transformers have a lifetime
warranty, but apparently their definition of
'lifetime' is not the same
as mine -- you will not get a free (or any other)
replacement now :-(.
Do you know if the 561 will require genuine
Tektronix probes like the
newer 60MHz analog Teks I mentioned before?
I wasn't aware _any_ Tektronix 'scopes needed
special probes (apart from
the plug-ins that came with integral probes). On
later 'scopes the probes
will do things like set the on-screen readout, but
that doesn't apply to
the 561.
Provided the probe can match the input impedance of
the 'scope, it will
work fine.
-tony
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More