On 16 Jan, 2008, at 18:00, cctalk-request at
classiccmp.org wrote:
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:13:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "James A. Markevitch" <jam at magic.com>
Subject: Re: VLSI of classic architectures (was Re: 11/70 board set on
e-bay. . .)
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <200801160613.WAA26599 at magellan.magic.com>
On 15/01/2008 17:37, James A. Markevitch wrote:
Chuckles
at the typo.Is the PDP-8 the only classic architecure
from the mid
1960's that was made with VLSI components.
IBM 360 (still being made today)
Is it?
The 360 itself is not, but the architecture is, and in multi-GHz
parts.
PDP-11
(LSI-11)
Definitely not mid 1960s. The first PDP-11 appeared in 1970, and
LSI-11
came out in 1975!
Well, the architecture was conceived in April 1969, I believe :-).
Guess
that's not quite mid 1960's.
It is not normal to consider conception dates, neither with computers
nor babies. I don't go calling my ICT 1301 a late '50s computer just
because it was conceived in 1959, nor because thats when some of the
technical drawings date from. Its an early '60s machine because the
first one shipped in 1962, and you could even argue about that as it
was actually an extra prototype which the University of London
pressed ICT into supplying because otherwise there would be no
undergraduate intake in 1962 as they were committed to it, having had
the computer on order for a LONG time. As the factory prototypes were
refined, engineers would be sent out to also modify the university's
machine.
At a meeting of the Computer Conservation Society, the chap in charge
of the software said it was the only computer which ICT/ICT ever
shipped where the system software and libraries were ready before the
first machine shipped. Most of it had been hand executed to verify it
apart from the real time aspects, which had been the big hold up,
particularly the routine which punched one card whilst reading six
cards and printing one line. For months they had been travelling from
London to Coventry every night to test the next amendment of version
one and failing whilst some of the programmers had been putting
together a version two in their spare time. One night they rang their
manager, waking him in the early hours. They said they were not
getting anywhere with version one, and asked for permission to try
version two. This was grudgingly given as a sop to frustration. It
worked first time, and version one was abandoned and at last all the
software was ready.
Roger Holmes.
Current custodian of the University of London machine, having bought
the 200,000 pound machine for 150 pounds in 1976.