5 Feb
1999
5 Feb
'99
9:08 a.m.
I don't think that 2/5/99 is a more valid date than 5/2/99
Anyways the Europeans got it right you are the one writting the date
backward. The proof is that everyone in europe places the day first so they
must be right. Hint the Europeans go in increasing relevance: day/month/year
and not the very unelegant month/day/year. Why don't you set the time in
Minutes:Seconds:Hours while you're at it?
Francois
Disclaimer: I've adopted the US standard now but I think it sucks.
Are you sure you're entering the time in the
"correct" format (i.e. not
like those silly Europeans who put the day before the month?)
Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Always hasslin' the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
5 Feb
5 Feb
9:37 a.m.
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, [iso-8859-1] Fran=E7ois Auradon wrote:
I don't think that 2/5/99 is a more valid date
than 5/2/99
Anyways the Europeans got it right you are the one writting the date
backward. The proof is that everyone in europe places the day first so th=
ey
must be right. Hint the Europeans go in increasing
relevance: day/month/y=
ear
and not the very unelegant month/day/year. Why
don't you set the time in
Minutes:Seconds:Hours while you're at it?
Francois
Disclaimer: I've adopted the US standard now but I think it sucks.
Oops. I forgot to add the :) at the end to prevent people from getting
hostile ;)
>Are you sure you're entering the time in the
"correct" format (i.e. not
>like those silly Europeans who put the day before the month?)
:)
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.=
com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
Always hasslin' the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
2:11 p.m.
Sam,
I am still a newbie to this group and the internet. Please answer this question.
What does :) mean?
John Amirault
Sam Ismail wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, [iso-8859-1] Fran?ois Auradon
wrote:
I don't think that 2/5/99 is a more valid
date than 5/2/99
Anyways the Europeans got it right you are the one writting the date
backward. The proof is that everyone in europe places the day first so they
must be right. Hint the Europeans go in increasing relevance: day/month/year
and not the very unelegant month/day/year. Why don't you set the time in
Minutes:Seconds:Hours while you're at it?
Francois
Disclaimer: I've adopted the US standard now but I think it sucks.
Oops. I forgot to add the :) at the end to prevent people from getting
hostile ;)
>Are you sure you're entering the time in
the "correct" format (i.e. not
>like those silly Europeans who put the day before the month?)
:)
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always hasslin' the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
9:48 p.m.
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, John Amirault wrote:
I am still a newbie to this group and the internet.
Please answer this
question. What does :) mean? John Amirault
If I told you I'd then have to kill you :)
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always hasslin' the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
9293
days inactive
9294
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
amirault＠epix.net -
dastar＠ncal.verio.com -
fauradon＠pclink.com