Actually, the factory fix was a "bucking transformer", a whole second power
transformer installed out of phase in series with the primary power
transformer so that the voltages were subtractive. There is a factory ECN
on this topic. But the bridge regulator solution was common among the user
base (I myself have used it) as a lot simpler and cheaper, and almost as
effective.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:07:56 -0600
From: Jim Battle <frustum at pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: S-100 power supply voltage ranges
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <49A96F6C.6060602 at pacbell.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Chuck Guzis wrote:
All of the S100 boards I've seen use simple linear
regulators, so you
need some headroom--but not too much. A lot of S100 7805s and LM323-
5s were operated within an inch of their maximum current ratings (some
had bypass resistors installed) and generated a lot of heat. I
wouldn't run the supply rails any higher than I had to.
Cheers,
Chuck
The Sol-20 had an app note about this problem. Apparently they shipped them
for a while with transformers that were out of spec with the end result that
the unregulated power ran high. The recommended fix was to take a power
bridge, mount it to the case, and wire it in series with the positive
voltage run in order to get a ~1.4V drop.