1 May
1997
1 May
'97
5:17 p.m.
By the way, now that I think about it, the KIM-1 was
by MOS
Technologies, which hadn't yet changed their name to Commodore. I don't
know how you want to handle that.
If I'm not mistaken, both names are on the board. I have a close-up
picture of that somewhere... I'll try to dig it out tommorrow.
ttfn
srw
------------------------------------------------------------
Walde Techonology http://scott.cprompt.sk.ca
Box 7284 finger: scott(a)cprompt.sk.ca
Saskatoon, SK S7K 4J2 email: scott(a)saskatoon.com
CANADA email: scott(a)cprompt.sk.ca
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s:+>: a- C++++$ UL++++$ !P L++ E- W+++$ N+ o? K? w$ O- M-- V PS+
PE++ Y+ PGP->++ t+ 5 X+ !R tv- b+ DI++++ D+ G e* h r++ y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
2 May
2 May
12:12 a.m.
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Scott Walde wrote:
Mine does anyway. I think it is one of the *newer* ones. (As I remember,
my order was held up to get chips that were backordered and lt *newest*
chip date is 8009 [I think that means week 9 of 1980 8-)])
By the Xtal in the tinned copper it says
commodore
C* - MOS
where thhe * is the little flag thingy Commodore used.
BC
By the way,
now that I think about it, the KIM-1 was by MOS
Technologies, which hadn't yet changed their name to Commodore. I don't
know how you want to handle that.
If I'm not mistaken, both names are on the
board. I have a close-up
picture of that somewhere... I'll try to dig it out tommorrow.
9878
days inactive
9878
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
danjo＠xnet.com -
scott＠saskatoon.com