Subject: Re: PDP-8 /e/f/m memory
From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:23:43 +1200
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
On 8/16/06, Bob Rosenbloom <bobalan at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
The 5 volt parts have a write cycle limitation
that's
not there with the 3.3 volt parts.
Ah... I did not know that 3.3V FRAMs were substantially longer-lived
than the original 5V versions. I'm still in favor of a pair of 62256s
(since they are so common and very cheap), but if I were to do an FRAM
board in the future, it's probably worth the extra buffers and
regulator to get chips that will last.
I'd not use FRAMSs for PDP-8 as the need to write the subroutine return
address at the begining of the subroutine would beat up some locations
a lot. Also the write cycle does have delays while writing goes on.
A better use for FRAMS is disk emulation. Lower number of write cycles
but lots of reads. A few of them could easily emulate a RK05f. Even a
pair of 32k SRAMS can emulate an RX08 (only faster!).
One forgets that a PDP-8 system with a few megabytes of storage is a BIG 8!
When you consider that SRAMS ar available to the 512kbyte range or larger
and the prices are low. It's very easy to consider semiconductor disks
in the megabyte range. If you resort to using DRAMS I have a pound of
30pin 1mb simms that easily could be used for a large disk simulation.
Allison