Message: 3
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 16:52:54 -0700
From: dwight elvey <dkelvey at hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Drive recovery
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <SNT129-W423C1F47E5486E7A1E8EFFA3F30 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
---snip---
Hi
If I was running a drive recovery business, every drive that came in
would be opened first in a clean room before powering on. If there
was a failure of one of the disk, shipping could have distributed bits
to unaffected surfaces.
I don't think I could run it any different than that. I'd have to charge
for that as well.
Dwight
Since most drive failures are not head disk interferences much less a crash,
the proposed process would unnecessarily both add cost and increase the risk
of head disk interference without, IMO, significantly changing the data
recovery probability.
The small particles that do the most damage are not visible so I am not sure
what one would do upon opening a drive unless there are many large visible
particles indicative of a rare catastrophic head crash. When there is a
catastrophic head crash the debris is well distributed by the rotating
disks, damaging all the heads and disks then. At this point the damage is
done and subsequent shipment and testing is not likely to do much more
damage. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult, perhaps impossible and
certainly expensive to recover data when there is such a catastrophic
failure. A simple audio test should be sufficient to detect a catastrophic
failure at which point you turn the drive off and consider the very limited
options available. One might consider a particle count test for
contamination but then it is not clear what one would do about it, purge
cycle perhaps.
So it seems to me that opening every drive is of little value
Tom