what about using SD cards? someone told me the innards were
better than the ones they use in USB drives and other have told me there is not
much difference?
Thanks Ed # _www.smecc.org_ (
http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 12/22/2012 9:51:23 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk-request at
classiccmp.org writes:
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:44:42 -0800
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Kerrville, TX warehouse pics
Message-ID: <50D5108A.9090001 at sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 12/21/2012 05:13 PM, barythrin at
gmail.com wrote:
Backing up a usb device sure but as Cindy pointed out
its likely a
poor backup media itself. Some friends and I all had 64mb flash
drives back when they were new. We all lost our copies of some source
code we had been using it for (portable coding drive so we could use
each others systems and have our progress). Left a sore spot despite
them being nice for quick trips or transferring files.
I'm still using my 256 and 512MB flash drives. But you have a point;
the consumer flash USB drives are not known for their robustness. When
customers ask to have data returned on USB flash, I balk a bit, and
insist on sending along a CD or DVD with the flash--and then hang onto
the data for at least 30 days.
Just like floppies, storage environment and handling means a lot. If
you're used to carrying a USB drive around in your pocket along with
your keys, you should probably have a backup of that data somewhere.
I mostly find pen drives useful for sneakernet and substitutes for CD
ROMs on systems that lack drives.
A useful comparison between SLC and MLC flash:
http://www.supertalent.com/datasheets/SLC_vs_MLC%20whitepaper.pdf
Speaking for myself, I have data backed up in several places, one of
them being off-site in a vault, against the day that we have a sudden
300m rise in sea level. :)
--Chuck