25 Nov
25 Nov
11:46 a.m.
Wonder if it's degaussed, "just like the one in the picture." :)
De
11:52 a.m.
Actually, I thought the only "existing" copies of Tahoe had corrupt
blocks on them. If someone can read this, we may be able to get
legit/non-corrupt Tahoe binaries?
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dennis Boone <drb at msu.edu> wrote:
Wonder if it's degaussed, "just like the one in the picture." :)
De
--
-Jon
Jonathan Katz, Indianapolis, IN.
12:08 p.m.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Jonathan Katz wrote:
Actually, I thought the only "existing"
copies of Tahoe had corrupt
blocks on them. If someone can read this, we may be able to get
legit/non-corrupt Tahoe binaries?
I have the Tahoe source laying around...I should try to build it
somewhere. Shame there's no VAX support in the kernel that works, iirc.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dennis Boone <drb
at msu.edu> wrote:
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Wonder if it's degaussed, "just like the one in the picture." :)
De
12:04 p.m.
On 11/25/2013 11:46 AM, Dennis Boone wrote:
Wonder if it's degaussed, "just like the one in the picture." :)
My observation, also.
1:48 p.m.
On 11/25/13 11:46 AM, Dennis Boone wrote:
Wonder if it's degaussed, "just like the one in the picture." :)
Nice that the guy just lifted a picture from the CHM collection. You can tell by the
catalog number in it.
3826
days inactive
3827
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
aek＠bitsavers.org -
b4＠gewt.net -
cclist＠sydex.com -
d235j.1＠gmail.com -
drb＠msu.edu -
jon＠jonworld.com