Are z80's still being produced? If so, are they the same as the 1980
ones? I would think so, since the TI-86 (still in production) uses
a z80. BTW, I guess comparing the multi-Z80 system to a 386 isn't too
fair. How much faster is it than 1 z80 running the same program? Why
is everyone making multi-z80 machines, anyway? Why not 6502 or 6800
or even (gasp!) 8088?
< connections is good, soldering them helped a bit
but no dice.
Huh? I have 6 cards, s100 protoboards with about 25-40 pieces of mos
and
TTL on them that I wrapped in 1981 still running.
Ohmic losses? What
were
you doing wrong. Remember #30 is for signals not
power!
< Have data transfers done with DMA, all memory mapped and irq driven
< to knock subCPU as needed to grab data then place it in CPU's lap.
< Leave CPU alone for processing. How about that?
Those 6 boards built a multi z80 system with DMA and slave processors
for
things like IO and disks. It helps but the z80 bus is
so busy that
it's
very hard to slip inbetween cycles so you steal cpu
cycles by holding
it
off with BUSRQ/. Z280, z8000 and Z380 use burst mode
access to the bus
so
that other devices can get in and get a few cycles
without holding up
the
cpu. Even with slaves you reach a bottleneck between
memory management
and overhead to move data around. Still the results with 6mhz z80s
were
enough to blow away 386/16 class machine for text
oriented
applications.
Allison
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at
http://www.hotmail.com