Nice PC-museum.. - test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

26 May 2007

...
 From: "Ensor" <classiccmp at
memory-alpha.org.uk> ---snip---
...

I'd like to think that if the 68k had been chosen we'd have had far more 
advanced PCs far quicker (I'm thinking back to the many 68k implementations 
of UNIX amongst other things). But I do take your point about the 
availability of software, let's face it, the *ONLY* reason I switched from 
my Atari ST to the PC was software.

Although....if we'd had 68k/UNIX based boxes on our desktops instead of 
8086/DOS who's to say that there wouldn't have been a similar explosion of 
software? 
Hi
I think most software people would agree but that hard fact is that
main memory is way behind processor speeds. This means that the
more compact the instruction stream is, the faster the processor can
run. We are quickly reaching the limits of clever caching, even for
CISC processors like the X86 machines.
I'm not saying that RISC machines are dead, just the opposite. Every
X86 machine today has a RISC engine inside.
I expect that the next generation processor will be even more
CISC like and less RISC like to the external software.
Memory bandwidth will dominate choices.
Just my thoughts
Dwight

_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine?s 2007 editors? choice for best Web mail?award-winning Windows 
Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_mig…