>> The CG-3 card that is in it either is not able
to push the
>> 1024x768x77 it's supposed to or not able to talk to any of my
>> monitors.
> My recollection is that the CG3 (and the CG6 as well) is a fixed
> rate card for 1152x900x8 at 66Hz.
The cg3, maybe. The cg6? Perhaps some of them are, but, in general,
they are not; every cg6 I've seen has a medium number of
resolution-and-frequency configs available (typically a dozen or so,
from something like 640x400x75 to 1152x900x60). Some
(a very few, in
my experience) support higher resolutions as well; I know I've
seen
1280x1024 and I think I've seen 1920x1080 and 1600x1280 - but only on,
like, one or two cards.
On many machines, it's possible to use semi-arbitrary resolution and
frequency settings. I worked this out in 2008 and sent mail to at
least two lists about it, but for the cg14;
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-sparc/2008/08/08/msg000133.html and
http://www.sunhelp.org/pipermail/rescue/2008-August/124772.html are the
archived copies of the two messages. (The
sunhelp.org one got mangled
slightly by something that mistook a string with an @ in it for an
email address; the
netbsd.org one looks intact.)
I recently tried to get an LX's onboard cg6 (with a VSIMM for the extra
RAM) to drive a slightly unusual flatscreen at its native resolution
(1680x1050, I think it was); while mostly neither here nor there, I did
learn that it can support only a small number of pixel clock
frequencies, so you have to be careful. I don't know to what extent
this is true of other cg6s....
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B