On Sun, 1 May 2005, Dave Dunfield wrote:
It means that ANADISK saw gaps in the sector
numbering.
For example, it might have seen sectors:
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9
In this case there is a "gap" which is sector #5 missing.
Gee, why can't it just say, "I didn't find sector 5" instead of the
message it gives, which is akin to, "Hey, I did find a sector between
11-20...guess which one?"
The higher the track, the smaller the
"circle" on the disk with the
data, hence the more densly packed the bits are - which can lead to
more errors - this is also the area where head alignment etc. can be
most critical, and worn drives do tend to give more errors on the
inner tracks.
Makes sense I suppose.
But it's may also be a incompatibility between the
diskette format and
the PC disk controller (I am assuming this is the 8" drive that you
have hooked up to a PC).
Yes, 8" drive. It works fine for the most part. I can even format a disk
with DOS and write files to it, read them back, etc.
The PC disk controller cannot handle gaps sizes as
small as some
other systems did - For example, I find that Cromemco disks do not
read reliably on my PC. The interesting thing is that certain sectors
consistantly do not read on one PC, while DIFFERENT sector(s) may not
read reliable on a different PC.
I would sometimes get back different errors from the same disk.
reliability. One thing I wanted to add to the program
was the ability to
merge multiple images read from different PCs into one to "collect" all
the sectors.
This would be useful.
If you format a disk from the PC can you read it back
reliably?
Yes.
Thanks for the input.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at
www.VintageTech.com || at
http://marketplace.vintage.org ]