Rumor has it that 'Computer Collector Newsletter' may have mentioned these words: <MODE="SnobbishQmailBAFH"> I really don't want to sound like a jerk, but that's about as useful as saying "My car was running fine right up until it quit. Why?" </MODE> We might if you actually gave us some useful information, like: 1) What email client are you using, and what version thereof? a) ThunderChicken b) OutHouse/LookOut Express c) Mutt d) Eudora e) Other 2) What spam filter(s) are you using, and what version thereof? a) ThunderChicken b) SpamAssassin c) Other 3) What rulesets/scores are setting off the "spam-alarm?" These could be found either in extra headers of the message, or in logfiles, depending on your setup. This info would give those of us who route mail for a living a *lot* more insight as to what's happening and why... Laterz, Roger "Merch" Merchberger -- Roger "Merch" Merchberger | Anarchy doesn't scale well. -- Me zmerch at 30below.com. | SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers

Evan wrote... Sorry, I'm behind (again) - just got back from a 3 day float trip :) It is a far, far, far, far more likely thing that something changed in your ISP's or your spam filtering tagging, than something changing on the list traffic. I can't think of anything that has changed that would affect headers or the likelyhood of triggering your (or your ISP's spam filters). You mean you hadn't whitelisted classiccmp? Jay