Does anyone know if the U-Max or the V2000 were marketed in the US? I've
never seen (or even heard of) anything like it. Does anyone know how much
one might cost if I could find one?
I like working with the older video equipment (mainly because I can fix the
stuff) My only VCR is an 80's top-loading GE, complete with _wired_ remote
:). The only reason that I bought the JVC VHS-C camera was because the
heads went bad in my old camera (the kind with the separate camera that
plugged into the 'VCR' that hung from a shoulder strap).
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, July 15, 1999 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: Video standards (was Re: digital cameras)
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Hans Franke wrote:
In fact, this is also why I don't like VHS -
maybe good
enough compared to a noisy aired NTSC source, but just
crap, compared to an U-Max or V2000 (I still use V2000
tape machines - still equal to any S-VHS stuff after more
than 10 years of development ...). And of course the same
for DVD vs. Laserdisk.
What is U-Max and V2000? I know what a Laserdisk player is, but I wasn't
U-max is possibly what we call U-matic, a Sony semi-professional video
system. I don't know any more as I've not obtained a machine (yet!).
V2000 is/was a Philips (machines were also made by Grundig, but AFIAK the
standard was Philips) system. It was beautiful. For one thing tapes could
be turned over like audio cassettes. For another there was no control
track amd no tracking control. The video heads were mounted on
piezo-actuators and a fairly complex servo system caused them to follow
the video tracks on the tape, based on signals recorded on said tracks.
Since the heads can follow the tracks no matter what speed (within
reason) the tape is running at, you can have noise-free slow motion, fast
motion, still frame, etc.
I can't remember the bandwidth, but I think it was better than normal VHS
(although probably not better than S-VHS).
I have a pair of VR2022's (one UK-PAL, one SECAM) awaiting some bench
space. They look interesting to work on - mechanically there's almost
nothing - no belts, no idler, no mode switch, no back-tension band,etc.
Just 5 motors (one for each spool, one forthe capstan, one for the video
head, one for the loading mechanism), a few optoswtiches, a couple of
microswitches, and not a lot else. Backtension, for example, is provided
by applying a small current to the rwwind motor - something that's a lot
simpler/more reliable than the VHS-style tension band
But it makes up for that simplicity in the electronics. There's a
dozen-or-so plug-in cards, 4 or 5 of them for the various servos. 2
microcontrollers (at a time when microcontrollers were not common in
consumer stuff). Looks possible to repair, though, and I have the manual.
-tony