On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Pete Turnbull wrote: > That's not what I'd call "high". That means that on average, you have

> correct or interpret every tenth character. I'd call less than 99%

> not high.

That's not what I meant. I did not study the results closely and so I wrote "high 90%" as a disclaimer to mean something like 98, 98.5, 99, 99.5, or 99.9. Perhaps I should have used the word "range". It seemed to me that I was getting less than 1 to no more than two words per hundred that needed correcting and I don't remember any punctuation or numerical errors.