Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
In article
<f4eb766f0904031640g7c90507eo92411f16365021e1 at mail.gmail.com>,
Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> writes:
> Back in the day, we used to move copies
around on magtape, bypassing
> all sorts of stream-of-bytes issues. Today, of course, most things
> expect streams of bytes, so that's how most things are presented.
How does magtape avoid the stream-of-bytes issue?
By the simple fact that a tape is *never* a stream of bytes?
Unix tries to mimic a stream of bytes on a tape, but as far as I know,
noone wants that, and never uses it, instead going to the raw device,
and doing all the operations a tape requires anyway.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol