On May 4, 2007, at 10:04 AM, M H Stein wrote:
I did indeed assume a filesystem; under what
circumstances would a
Unix hard disk not have a file system?
---------------
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
One example is the use of a raw partition for, say, a database.
This is not uncommon in Oracle installations, for example.
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
Informix does this also. It has a whole management subsystem for its
"raw" dataspaces.
From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com>
So do PostgreSQL, DB2 and many others. It's a fairly common feature.
---------------
Well, yes; in fact I used to use Informix and still have disks & docs that
I've been meaning to archive and/or re-install some day, but if I were asking
how to copy a data partition I think I'd call it an Informix disk and not a Unix
disk, since that would certainly have a bearing on the how-to. However,
now that I re-read the header I can see that he could have meant "copy a disk
using Unix" instead of "copy a Unix disk" (which is what I assumed he
meant).
What would life be without ambiguity...
Now, back to Andy, the original poster: did your question get answered?
m