Actually, I like them both for what they are. CP/M is
nice because it is
simple. No libraries, no shared files, all files that are needed for an
application are usually in one directory and not strewn across the
directory structure. (But, it doesn't TCP/IP. DAMN!)
Linux on the other hand is GREAT for it's multi-user, multi-tasking and
networking abilities! I love every one of my Linux boxes! But, it is a
flavor of Unix and therefore has endless numbers of library files (that
somehow are never the right version) and an application's needed support
files are strewn across 50 different directories.
You make the "real world" sound like it's a competition between
Microsoft products and Unix-derived products. In reality, there
are many OS's out there which fall into neither category and are
more than capable (and in all cases more capable than Unix-like
or Microsoft OS's) to do the real-world jobs that they do. And many
of these OS's run quite nicely on classic hardware, to boot.
Anyone who thinks that the OS issue is entirely limited to Unix-alikes vs
Microsoft vs CP/M is putting on a very limiting set of blinders as to
what is out there doing the real work in banks, offices, factories,
labs, and hospitals.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW:
http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927