Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:19:15 -0800
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: IBM mechnical devices
On 30 Nov 2007 at 5:46, M H Stein wrote:
> The keypunch equivalents could, but were much too
slow for serious output
> operations. Not only were they slower to begin with, but they punched 80
> columns lengthwise while pretty well all the electro-mechanical EAMs worked
> on the principle of a 12-phase synchronized cycle across the card, corresponding
> to the 12 zones of the cards.
...and if you were one of the poor unfortunates to get
saddled with
the 024 keypunch in a room of 026s, you needed the 557--the 024
didn't print on the card--you flew "blind" or you just read the punch
holes visually.
When they did it full-time, keypunchers and EAM operators got pretty
good at sight-reading cards...
Fortunately, there was a standard IBM card form that
numbered the
interpreter print columns on the two top rows as 1-60 and 61-80, so
you could figure out what printed character corresponded to what
punched column. Unless of course, some practical joker decided to
swap a couple of wires on the 557 plugboard...
Heh, heh... yes, there was lots of opportunity for practical jokes...
Later, some keypunches could be used as light-duty card
punches for
systems. I recall a CDC 1700 mini being hooked to a Univac keypunch.
Tab offered a keypunch that had an RS-232C interface on it and
probably were not the only ones. Both of those, IIRC, had "buffered"
keyboard interfaces--you typed in the card, then the punch punched
the whole thing.
So did the later "normal" keypunches from IBM et al.
I preferred the 029 "press a key, get a
kerchunk".
Later, I had the same issue with the daisywheel typewriters that
seemed to print asynchronously with one's typing.
Cheers,
Chuck
Yes, they definitely had audible and tactile feedback; in fact you could feel
it in your feet ;-)
And then there were "light" keypunches. I've got one here by Wright that
works like the old Dymo label makers: you dial up your character, press
the punch bar and it moves to the next column (and prints BTW).
mike