On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Hmm, I'm pretty sure I've used a VT220 with
VTEDIT. I could try again
tonight... (Well, okay, I don't have any VT220 anymore, but I have VT320,
VT420, VT510, VT520 and VT525 to test with.)
I have no datapoints for those other terminals, but I'd be happy to
hear your results. They may work just fine. I only ever tested the
VT220 specifically. If I can ever carve out some PDP-8 time, I want
to run some VTEDIT tests now that I have lots of terminals lying
around. Back in the day, I only had a current-loop console cable, so
my choice of terminals was limited. Now, of course, I'd just whip up
a EIA cable, but then, I would have had to buy one.
If you are
just doing rather ordinary things with OS/8, a VT220 should
work just fine.
I never saw any problems at all with anything, using a VT100 or more modern,
with OS/8. Most programs expected it to be in VT52-mode, though.
Yes. I don't know if I ever saw an OS/8 application that tried to
write ANSI terminal sequences. I first ran into those with VMS 3.x
and RT-11 a few years after I first started playing with OS/8.
-ethan