From: Patrick Finnegan <pat at
computer-refuge.org>
On Saturday 11 August 2007 17:26, Marvin Johnston wrote:
They are not only wrong, but rather vague! But
for their list of the
top 5 collectible computers, take a look at:
I don't see how you can say that they're wrong. It's *CNET*s top 5.
Just like Bill or Joe's Top 5. Ie, the 5 machines that the people at
CNET who wrote the story thought were most collectable.
Actually, when I first wrote it, I had a smiley at the end. They are welcome to
their ideas, but with nothing to indicate how they came up with these five and
what *their* qualifications for making the list, the list is rather worthless.
Much like the person who put an Apple IIe up for sale on Ebay at $5K or so.