> Nope, not gonna take it back.
> In my circle of users in Brooklyn, EVERYBODY with a Model I had a
> doubler if they had disk drives. EVERYBODY.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Tony Duell wrote:
It is extremely unscientific to stick to a statement
when you have clear
evidence to the contrary.
I haven't seen any clear evidence that he every hung out with anybody
without a doubler, so his statement could be technically true.
This is a ninternational list. I qould guess there are
many people here
(including mysef) who have never been to Brooklyn.
But, if you ever do, apparently EVERYBODY in Brooklyn had a doubler.
So, Brooklyn might be a good place to buy RS Expansion Interfaces.
> I'm sure there are people on this list who
didn't. Because you guys
> can be pretty stubborn, ornery and non-standard.
well, yeah.
> and had lots of trouble reading disks.
Among the people that _I_ hung out with, everybody had already solved that
long before the doubler became available.
This is soemthing I can't explain. I have a
'stock' M1 EI, using the
internal data separator of the 1771. I never had _any_ problems with it.
It read disks with no isseus at all. I had many more problems with the M3
(first of all that infernal tapewire cable between the CPU board and the
disk controller board, and in fact I had to replace the 1793 chip in the
M3 at least once). Oh well...
I wonder if there were any differences in the Expansion Interface, other
than the power supply?
Around here, there were lots of EI problems unrelated to the FDC.
RS did a "free" "upgrade" of EIs to a "buffered cable"
between the CPU and
the EI, then did an "upgrade" to add an additional DIN cabel, then another
"upgrade" which included switching back to an unbuffered cable.
As I said, I was seriously ocnsidering a Doubler, but
finding an M3 at a
low price removed the need for it...
a doubler was worth having, but there were other alternatives, including
mutually incompatible other devices for the same connections.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com