22 Jul
2006
22 Jul
'06
1:35 a.m.
If anyone wants 3.5" DSDD disks from me, I'm all out. That lot that I
posted about last week is mostly bad judging from the sixty I've gone
through so far. With 200 to go, I'll just chuck this mess out unless
someone here wants to do something silly like make a suit of armour out of
floppies. If that's the case, I'll sell the whole lot for the cost of
shipping.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
22 Jul
22 Jul
1:49 a.m.
David Griffith wrote:
If anyone wants 3.5" DSDD disks from me, I'm
all out. That lot that I
posted about last week is mostly bad judging from the sixty I've gone
through so far. With 200 to go, I'll just chuck this mess out unless
someone here wants to do something silly like make a suit of armour out of
floppies. If that's the case, I'll sell the whole lot for the cost of
shipping.
How does an entire lot go bad? Are you seeing an exorbitant amount of
bad sectors after a format?
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
2:06 a.m.
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Jim Leonard wrote:
David Griffith wrote:
The most handy machine for testing these is a Linux box. Since these were
previously used on an Amiga, I need to do a low-level format before using
mformat. Here's the typical response:
# fdformat /dev/fd0u720
Double-sided, 80 tracks, 9 sec/track. Total capacity 720 kB.
Formatting ... done
Verifying ... Problem reading cylinder 62, expected 9216, read 2048
These disks were found in a box, not protected very well from dust. That
might have done it.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
If anyone wants 3.5" DSDD disks from me,
I'm all out. That lot that I
posted about last week is mostly bad judging from the sixty I've gone
through so far. With 200 to go, I'll just chuck this mess out unless
someone here wants to do something silly like make a suit of armour out of
floppies. If that's the case, I'll sell the whole lot for the cost of
shipping.
How does an entire lot go bad? Are you seeing an exorbitant amount of
bad sectors after a format? 
3:55 a.m.
How does an
entire lot go bad? Are you seeing an exorbitant amount of
bad sectors after a format?
The most handy machine for testing these is a Linux box. Since these were
previously used on an Amiga, I need to do a low-level format before using
mformat. Here's the typical response:
# fdformat /dev/fd0u720
Double-sided, 80 tracks, 9 sec/track. Total capacity 720 kB.
Formatting ... done
Verifying ... Problem reading cylinder 62, expected 9216, read 2048
These disks were found in a box, not protected very well from dust. That
might have done it. 
3:14 p.m.
Dave Dunfield wrote:
Is the drive (heads) clean? Try giving the drive a good cleaning before you
chuck the disks.
...and if that doesn't help it's perhaps worth pulling the drive and checking
inside for foreign objects, just in case.
have you got other DD disks from a different batch / system that format OK
with that drive? Or a different drive you can try to rule out any problem with
the existing one?
cheers
Jules
How does an entire lot go bad? Are you seeing an
exorbitant amount of
bad sectors after a format?
The most handy machine for testing these is a Linux
box. Since these were
previously used on an Amiga, I need to do a low-level format before using
mformat. Here's the typical response:
# fdformat /dev/fd0u720
Double-sided, 80 tracks, 9 sec/track. Total capacity 720 kB.
Formatting ... done
Verifying ... Problem reading cylinder 62, expected 9216, read 2048
These disks were found in a box, not protected very well from dust. That
might have done it. 
3:24 p.m.
It could also be the same situation as the large box of 3.5" DS2D diskettes
that we have--they were rejects accumulated over a few years of
duplication. They're unlikely to get much better.
Cheers,
Chuck
6728
days inactive
6728
days old
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
cclist＠sydex.com -
dave06a＠dunfield.com -
dgriffi＠cs.csubak.edu -
julesrichardsonuk＠yahoo.co.uk -
trixter＠oldskool.org