From: "Scott Stevens" <chenmel at
earthlink.net>
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
steven stengel <tosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
Maybe he should split it up a little - 3 tons of
computers is a lot for anyone to take...
Perhaps his 'ego' is wrapped up in it remaining a collection. It isn't
unusual for somebody to spend a lifetime putting together what they
consider 'the ultimate collecton' and despairing at the idea of it being
split apart into fragments, undoing the thing the collector worked long
and hard to accomplish. It isn't unusual for collectors of various
things to want to bestow them, complete, to an institution that will
keep it together as a collection.
Hi
There is also the issue of putting together the documentation.
Often times one piece of documentation or even a piece of
software is really relevant to several items. Figuring what goes
with what is not straight forward in all cases. Splitting these
items into the smallest pieces detracts from the value of
the hole group. To make things a little more difficult is that
the overlap many not make nice partitioning either.
It is difficult to say to what level he should split things.
If he splits things into categories, like all the AppleII's
in one pile, he may make the package less desirable to someone
that already has most of the pieces. If he splits it down to
the smallest piece, it loses value as a collection.
On top of it all, he may not be physically or mentally able
to handle splitting it up because of a medical condition.
All that being said, it would be unlikely that he'd find
a buyer for the entire lot that would compare with the
individual values of the items. He needs to find a way to
partition it into reasonable blocks.
Dwight