>So, who WERE the worst EARLY clones?
>There WERE much worse machines than Sanyo. (which suffered more from
>incompatability than quality).
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Chris Tofu wrote:
Hyundai were
also too late I assume. Tandy was questionable, but in
reality not as bad as their
rep.
Yep. another case of not being exactly the same, and catching flack for
that. Marketing did little or nothing to help prevent people looking for
a CHEAPER 5150 from buying a machine that was DIFFERENT.
That was probably MOST of the Sanyo sales, and even the RS 2000.
CordatA, Corona? Can't say.
Mediocre, not bad. Trivial incompatabilities, such as difference in what
the BRIGHT bit did in video attributes when in reverse video (0Fh) (should
it then affect foreground or background?)
But, I did love their laser printer. CX engine, with controller/rasterizer
card in the PC (software limited to refuse to work with 286). "Poems"
made a very easy to use font editor that supported it, as well as HP.
I made 7 x 9 pixel "Fiche" fonts so that I could carry hundreds of
"pages"
of source code on a few sheets of paper in my shirt pocket. But,
presbyopia hit me very hard, and I can no longer read any of my old stuff.
There were gujillions of Taiwanese boxes in those
days. There were kit
computers. I know I'll get egged for.this, but personally I think people
were stupid to not build a clone from parts they mail ordered from the
back of BYTE.
There was a local surplus dealer who had Augat sockets cheap! At local
swaps, I was able to buy bare imitation 5160 motherboards. I learned to
solder, often while watching TV. The third one that I assembled worked!
By then, I was also no longer putting in sockets for DIP Switches and
resistor packs :-)
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com