Eric J Korpela <korpela at ssl.berkeley.edu> wrote:
Some BASICs used RND(0) to get the previous random
number and RND(1)
to generate a new number. Some used the reverse... Others used
RND(N) to generate a number between 0 and N.
I think most DEC basics used RND(1) to generate a new number (except
for VAX basic, which, IIRC just used a pseudovariable called RND to
generate random numbers).
BASIC+2 (on the PDP-11):
.help/bp2 fun buil rnd
The RND function returns a random number greater than or equal to zero
and less than one.
Format
real-vbl = RND
Example
990 R_num = RND
.help/bp2 sta random
The RANDOMIZE statement gives the random number function, RND, a new
starting point.
Format
{ RANDOMIZE }
{ RANDOM }
Example
45 RANDOMIZE
---
I know of other BASICs as well who used that convention.
Yep, just checked. RND(1) seems more typical. There
are a few basic
dialects listed on my Ahl's simple benchmark page...
I'd say it might be a bit hasty to say so. Many of those dialects you
have there are really the same. Very many Micro computers used
Microsofts BASIC. I wouldn't call that different dialects.
Anyhow, I grabbed the VAX BASIC version and compiled it on a PPD-11 with
RSX and BASIC+2. Here is the result:
.run rand
340 iterations.
.588235E-01 seconds per iteration
Accuracy .685425E-01
Random 6.23425
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol