I should have realized that it was Dilog. Interesting, I wasn?t aware that was due to
Royalty payments that you had to choose between Tape, Disk, or Disk/Tape. That makes
perfect sense. I can?t speak for Dilog, my experience is with the Viking boards (I forget
how many names they were sold under).
With the Viking (Unibus and Q-Bus), you need the correct PAL, the correct EPROM, and you
need the correct cab-kit that lets you log into the controller and flip a couple bits.
I need to work on a power-supply or two for my PDP-11?s. I don?t really feel like letting
the magic smoke out on my BA23 or BA123.
Zane
On Nov 1, 2021, at 6:09 PM, Nigel Johnson Ham
<g4ajq1 at gmail.com> wrote:
No, Zane, it is made by Dilog. I heard that the device can do both tape and disk, but
that to save money on DEC's royalty payments they only put the proms in for what you
bought - which is not a problem since I got two of them!
I figure if you can't beat it, go with the flow! I am going to move the Plessey
DCV54 to 160340 and let the SQ706 play at 172150, even though its diagnostic says
its at 174500! The reason I know it is coming up at 172150 is that the DCV54 diagnostic
says there is a non-DCV54 controller there, only when the SQ703(6) is plugged in.
Unfortunately there are other jobs I have to do first, including fixing a very noisy
power contactor in a DEC power controller that is upsetting the wife, and the microvax
seems to have a ground loop voltage that is preventing me from entering anything on the
console channel since I installed the power converter!
Cheers,
Nigel
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
Skype: TILBURY2591 nw.johnson at
ieee.org <mailto:nw.johnson at ieee.org>
On 2021-11-01 1:40 p.m., Zane Healy wrote:
> Who made the SQ703/SQ706? Is this a rebadge Viking board? If so then it?s the PAL.
>
> I think that the OED needs to improve their definition of VAX.
>
> Zane
>
>
>
>
>> On Nov 1, 2021, at 4:23 AM, Nigel Johnson Ham via cctalk <cctalk at
classiccmp.org> <mailto:cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>> A few months ago, thanks to help from several people here, I converted
>> an SQ703 TMSCP controller to SQ706 MSCP.
>>
>> I had problems trying to use it on the vax due to the complexity of
>> mapping Q-Bus registers under ODT, so put off trying until I got the
>> LSI-11/73 going.
>>
>> Now I have a problem: It seems to run and recognise the controller as
>> SQ706 according to the on-board diagnostics, however it insists saying
>> it is at 777450, the TMSCP address. Trying to change it gives me an
>> out-of-bounds message.
>>
>> OK, I thought, I will just use it there.
>>
>> Put it in to a running RT11 system and it shows up at 772150 and clashes
>> with an existing controller!
>>
>> It seems that one of the PALs is maybe setting up the address!
>>
>> Anybody else tried this?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>> Here's the fun:
>>
https://www(dot)bbc(dot)com/news/entertainment-arts-59089596
<https://www(dot)bbc(dot)com/news/entertainment-arts-59089596>
>>
>> Maybe our vax computers will become popular once again!
>>
>> --
>> Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, MCSE VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
>> Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
>> Skype: TILBURY2591 nw.johnson at
ieee.org <mailto:nw.johnson at ieee.org>
>>
>>
>>