On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Tony Duell wrote:
"On disk platters," he said,
"the inside track
is the least reliable one."
It was a very popular column.
Of which ancient systems was this true?
On drives that store the same number of bits/track - most floppies apart
from Commodore and Mac ones, most 'raw-interfaced' hard disks (ST506,
SMD, RK05, RL01, etc), the inner track has the smallest area storing each
bit (think about it, the inner track is shorter).
So, it's possible that the inner track is the least reliable. I've
certainly had more floppies fail on the inner tracks than the outer ones.
On the other hand, one of the outer tracks - the one that contains the
directory - is accessed much more frequently than any other. It is there
that I have experienced the greatest number of failures.
- don
Today's
CD-ROMs are the opposite, I've heard: as the head positions
to the outermost area of the disc, it tends to push dust along the
guides, and many CD drives accumulate a pile of dust out there,
preventing it from reaching "the end."
Well, that problem is trivially solved by keeping the rails clean :-)...
Seriously, some drives do a full seek (heads to both endstops) at
spin-up. The RK07 certainly does. I suspect this would quite happily keep
the dust down. Maybe CD-ROMs should as well.
- John
-tony
donm(a)cts.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Don Maslin - Keeper of the Dina-SIG CP/M System Disk Archives
Chairman, Dina-SIG of the San Diego Computer Society
Clinging tenaciously to the trailing edge of technology.
Sysop - Elephant's Graveyard (CP/M) Z-Node 9 - 619-454-8412
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
see old system support at
http://www.psyber.com/~tcj
visit the "Unofficial" CP/M Web site at
http://cdl.uta.edu/cpm
with Mirror at
http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~cfs/cpm