The 8205's I have are. Arent there also 8505's too?
The biggest problem with exabyte was that they seemed to license bunches
of customized versions of their firmware. If you bought an OEM drive
you got a pretty vanilla unit, but some of the drives in such as IBM and
some mainframe devices I have had custom firmwares which had to be
duplicated into the drives to make them work properly.
Later versions of AIX didn't care, but some of the earlier versions
would not talk to the non IBM version of the exabyte properly. It took
over a year in the mid 80's time frame for them to get both AIX and the
tape drives they built with their badge to work with our software. The
main problems were unreliable tape mark and end of tape behavior. It
would miss tape marks all the times when we would read the tapes back,
and frequently the end of tape would miss records and tape marks as well.
We did not use the tapes with a preformatted capacity but relied on
finding the EOT when writing to completely fill the tape. So the latter
problem with EOT errors made things pretty miserable.
Jim
Tim Riker wrote:
I was thinking the 8205 was a half height and the 8200
was a full height.
--
**********************************
*
* note my email address is changing to jws at
jwsss.com
*
**********************************