<> Despite their possible historical
significance, I've never been able
<> to justify keeping a Microvax I around. The 11/730 - which for most
<I suppose it'd be a relatively UN-power-sucking way to enjoy or learn
<VAX assembly language.
Microvax-I uses more power than a microvax-II. The lowest power VAXen of
the lot may be the vs2000 or the 3100m38s as they are in the PC power use
range and performance is good(maybe the best!) on a per watt basis.
UN-power-sucking compared to an 11/750 is what I meant.
Anthony Clifton - WireHead Prime