29 Dec
2012
29 Dec
'12
2:20 p.m.
------------------------------
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 1:09 PM PST Fred Cisin wrote:
hows about reversing the motors direction, perhaps using a twisty belt for the
udder sides? Money is an issue at the moment, considering it migh take the better part of
a c note to have it delivered.
> > >
SHUGART 801 is SINGLE sided
> > > SHUGART 851 is DOUBLE sided.
> ONCE MORE!
> Do you want to read double sided disks?
> If so, then you need the 851. Option board
will certainly
> not give you capability of reading double sided disks in a
> single sided drive.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Chris Tofu wrote:
C:\DERP> But the option board just reads flux.
Why couldn't you put a
double sided disk in a single sided drive and read it off. My Commie
1541-II used to read the one side of a single sided disk. Maybe I don't
have an acceptable understanding of what the Option Board/software does.
Your commode doesn't use index pulse.
With the option board and a double sided disk in a single sided
drive, you will be able to read the first side of the disk.
If you flip the disk over and put it in backwards, the
Option Board SOFTWARE will not work at all, because it won't
see any index pulse. (NOT USED in Commode, Apple][, and Atari)
IF you repunch the jacket, or modify the drive for an
additionalindex sensor, so that it sees an index pulse,
then the Option Board software will still be useless,
because it can't understand backwards tracks, and they
never considered adding such a capability to the software
just because you won't get a double sided drive for your
double sided diskettes.
IFF you repunch the jacket or modify the drive, AND write
your own software from scratch for a flux-transition board,
then there is no reason why you couldn't read the second
side of the disk by flipping it.
Is it THAT hard to find a double sided drive??
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
29 Dec
29 Dec
2:52 p.m.
>IFF you repunch the jacket or modify the drive,
AND write
>your own software from scratch for a flux-transition board,
>then there is no reason why you couldn't read the second
>side of the disk by flipping it.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Chris Tofu wrote:
hows about reversing the motors direction, perhaps
using a twisty belt
for the udder sides? Money is an issue at the moment, considering it
migh take the better part of a c note to have it delivered.
To really be useful, the Option Board needs completely
different software.
If you write new software for it, then it would be a nice
feature to include analysis of reversed tracks.
There is a document on the web somewhere on programming the
Option Board. (The "Confidential" stamped on it is an error
from a new clerk at my office who thought that rubber
stamps
were fun)
But, if you modify the drive for a different index sensor
(hint: I have modified 5.25" drives to index from the spindle,
instead of the disk! (for other reasons)), or repunch the jacket
(sorry, I am completely out of stock on 8" index repunch jigs),
then reversing the motor might be a way to go. SOME drives have
DC motors, some AC. Electrically reversing the motor might be
more reliable than a twisted belt.
Converting a single sided drive to double sided doesn't seem
practical either.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
3:53 p.m.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Fred Cisin wrote:
If you write new software for it, then it would be a
nice
feature to include analysis of reversed tracks.
There is a document on the web somewhere on programming the
Option Board. (The "Confidential" stamped on it is an error
from a new clerk at my office who thought that rubber stamps
were fun)
I haven't been able to find any API documention for the Deluxe Option
Board. If your writeup pertains to it, a URL or valid Google search term
would be greatly appreciated.
--
4:17 p.m.
> There is a document on the web somewhere on
programming the
> Option Board.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Steven Hirsch wrote:
I haven't been able to find any API documention
for the Deluxe Option
Board. If your writeup pertains to it, a URL or valid Google search term
would be greatly appreciated.
Not my write-up; just something that Central Point sent me.
It does not exactly match what I found in disassembly of
TE.COM
They wanted software to transfer files to and fro with Mac
diskettes. I told them that the [non-deluxe] Option Board
did not have enough range of data transfer rate. They went
with somebody else for the software for the Deluxe.
4375
days inactive
4376
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
cisin＠xenosoft.com -
rampaginggreenhulk＠yahoo.com -
snhirsch＠gmail.com