Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20201125180048.IvtOI%steffen at sdaoden.eu>: |Grant Taylor wrote in | <9c1595cc-54a1-8af9-0c2d-083cb04dd97c at spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>: ||As I find myself starting yet another project that that wants to use ||ANSI control sequences for colorization of text, I find myself -- yet ||again -- wondering if there is a better way to generate the output from ||the code in a way that respects TERMinal capabilites. || ||Is there a better / different control sequence that I can ~> should use ||for colorizing / stylizing output that will account for the differences ||in capabilities between a VT100 and XTerm? || ||Can I wrap things that I output so that I don't send color control ||sequences to a TERMinal that doesn't support them? | | color_init() { | [ -n "${NOCOLOUR}" ] && return | [ -n "${MAILX_CC_TEST_NO_COLOUR}" ] && return | # We do not want color for "make test > .LOG"! | if (command -v stty && command -v tput) >/dev/null 2>&1 && Of course that subshell (..if it is one..) is not necessary, it could be { ..; } or x&&y&&, whatever. Must be a leftover, or whatever i have thought once i wrote this. | (<&1 >/dev/null stty -a) 2>/dev/null; then | { sgr0=`tput sgr0`; } 2>/dev/null | [ $? -eq 0 ] || return | { saf1=`tput setaf 1`; } 2>/dev/null | [ $? -eq 0 ] || return | { saf2=`tput setaf 2`; } 2>/dev/null | [ $? -eq 0 ] || return | { saf3=`tput setaf 3`; } 2>/dev/null | [ $? -eq 0 ] || return | { b=`tput bold`; } 2>/dev/null | [ $? -eq 0 ] || return | | COLOR_ERR_ON=${saf1}${b} COLOR_ERR_OFF=${sgr0} | COLOR_WARN_ON=${saf3}${b} COLOR_WARN_OFF=${sgr0} | COLOR_OK_ON=${saf2} COLOR_OK_OFF=${sgr0} | unset saf1 saf2 saf3 b | fi |} | |Is what i use for a make system. A sh(1)-based test, to be exact. Ciao, --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)