Hi
I tend to agree with Sellam. If one wants, it
is usually a trivial job to extract the file(s) of
interest from an image. It is impossible to guess
what piece might be missing from a pile of files.
I don't think space is an issue any more.
Dwight
From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf at
siconic.com>
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Barry Watzman wrote:
While images are nice, for CP/M there is another
alternative that may be
more widely useful and easier, although it's less historically accurate.
That is just to copy the files over to MS-DOS disks, where they can then
exist in folders on a modern hard drive or be put on CDs or DVDs. I can
really see no advantage to a strict "image", as long as one has the files.
The issue that this leaves out is the system tracks, but that is easily
dealt with: Runs "SYSGEN", exit, and then do a "SAVE 34 SYSTEM.COM"
and you
have the system tracks as a disk file in a format that is easily restored
simply using SYSGEN.
This method also has some actual advantages, in terms of being able to
actually use the software with a CP/M emulator on a PC.
Since I'm not aware of any CP/M programs that did copy protection or any
other type of manipulation that would require an exact disk image, I don't
really see the drawback of this approach.
The one main drawback is that this is not an accurate or appropriate way
to create an image for historical preservation. For this reason I
recommened against what you describe.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at
www.VintageTech.com || at
http://marketplace.vintage.org ]