26 Sep
2002
26 Sep
'02
4:48 p.m.
Hi
Check out:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2057333335
Later
Dwight
26 Sep
26 Sep
5:42 p.m.
New subject: Tek 4051 Re: Altair stuff
The same guy has a manual for the Tektronix 4051 computer. See
<http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2057332938>
Joe
At 06:49 PM 9/26/02 -0700, you wrote:
Hi
Check out:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2057333335
Later
Dwight
27 Sep
27 Sep
7:55 a.m.
New subject: Tek 4051 Re: Altair stuff
BTW I have a 4051 manual free to any one who wants to pick it up in the SF Bay
Area...
I will not ship it (too heavy and not enough time)
Peter Wallace
10:05 a.m.
New subject: Prior art for multi-resolution computers?
Hello,
I'd be interested in hearing about prior art, provable and demonstrable,
that repudiates this:
There is a very old patent, 1982, that Compaq owns that they claim covers
any computer that displays more than one resolution on a monitor, using
different horizontal scan rates, where the resultant displays are the same
size on the monitor.
Any comments on machines that can disprove this claim?
Cheers,
Dan
10:26 a.m.
New subject: Prior art for multi-resolution computers?
Wouldn't this patent have expired by now, or are you just curious if it
was really a first at the time?
Does PAL use a different horizontal scan rate than NTSC? If so, perhaps
some sort of studio production computer interface would have had this ability.
--tom
At 03:15 PM 9/27/2002 -0400, Dan Veeneman wrote:
Hello,
I'd be interested in hearing about prior art, provable and demonstrable,
that repudiates this:
There is a very old patent, 1982, that Compaq owns that they claim covers
any computer that displays more than one resolution on a monitor, using
different horizontal scan rates, where the resultant displays are the same
size on the monitor.
Any comments on machines that can disprove this claim?
Cheers,
Dan
1:44 p.m.
New subject: Prior art for multi-resolution computers?
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Dan Veeneman wrote:
Hello,
I'd be interested in hearing about prior art, provable and demonstrable,
that repudiates this:
There is a very old patent, 1982, that Compaq owns that they claim covers
any computer that displays more than one resolution on a monitor, using
different horizontal scan rates, where the resultant displays are the same
size on the monitor.
Any comments on machines that can disprove this claim?
Is this request by way of the engineer from Hawaii hired by a law firm to
come up with some prior art for this?
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
7969
days inactive
7970
days old
5 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
dan＠ekoan.com -
dwightk.elvey＠amd.com -
foo＠siconic.com -
pcw＠mesanet.com -
rigdonj＠cfl.rr.com -
uban＠ubanproductions.com