Tony duell wrote:
This is about as sensible as saying that 'pianos and guitars are musical =
instruments, if you enjoy playing one you _must_ necessarily enjoy the=20
other'.=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Billy: I don't think I used the word "must" in my comments. But =
certainly
many musicians enjoying playing both, my youngest daughter included. =
Sure. There are plenty of people too, who enjoy both working on real old
classic computers and running emulators on modern machines. And plenty of
people who like both old and new computers. But this doesn't mean that
everybody who likes old computers likes new ones too.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Duell: To be honest, I am not a 'computer person'. I don't much =
enjoy=20
programming. I'm an electronics/mechanical person. I like tinkering with =
hardware, but it computers, radios, cameras, clocks, whatever. So I =
could=20
turn your statement round and say 'Well, you enjoy working on your 1962=20
mainframe, why don't you strip down an M-series Leica. It's all =
machinery=20
after all'
-tony
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Billy: A big difference between us then. I have loved computers since =
Sure. This list would be terribly boring if we were all totally alike :-)
my
very first one, an IBM 650 in 1958. In the Army, I did some mortar =
tracking
computers so had to work with analogue computers as well as digital.
Programming is like doing puzzles: a little is a lot of fun but a lot is =
no
fun at all.
Agreed. And yes, I can program, and yes I have written programs. But I
don't much enjoy it. The puzzles I enjoy (if you think of them as such)
are tracking down faults in real hardware.
Again we are differnt. I have a lot of respect for people who write
complicated programs (particularly if they then open-source them so I can
learn from what they did). But this doesn't mean I have to want to do it
myself.
Strip a Leica? Well if I can find a cheap one, I might do it. I have =
Cheap and Leica don't normally go together :-)
done
dozens of MP3 players in the last year, and a Canon and JVC camcorder.
Though it is not so much a tear down as reverse engineering. If the =
Leica
uses a 1" drive, then I'll definitely put it on the list. Cameras are =
Eh? A Leica M series is a 35mm rangefinder camera. The only electrical
parts are the flash synchonisation contacts in the older models (later
ones have a built-in exposure meter). Surely you don't think all cameras
are digital?
fun -
I get to buy new tools to work on them.
Tell me about it. I'll have to order as special toolkit just to get the
top plate off my M-series Leica...
However, for _most_ cameras the only special tool you need is an
adjustable spanner wrench (this is not the same as an adjustable wrench,
OK) to remvoe the retaining rings in the lenx/shutter assembly, etc. A
good one is not cheap, but I am glad I bought it.
If you want camera tools (including precision screwdrivers, pliers,
tweezers, etc that are useful for classic computer repair too), look at
Microtools. Not cheap, but they have some very interesting stuff.
I like machinery less than computers but still putz
around. That's =
partly
why I specialized in peripherals for the last 30 years. Besides, the =
As a related point, I feel that classic computers should be more than
just the CPU. The peripherals need to be preserved too. Perhaps it's
because I regard all of them (including the CPU) as just being
complex/interesting electronic and/or mechanical systems that I can find
as much interest in, say, a printer as in a CPU.
super
computers were dying and the minis just weren't as much fun.
But even peripherals can be too much mechanical for me sometimes. =
Anyone on
the list ever work on an IBM-1311 or CDC 807/808 or CDC 813/814? All of
these featured hydraulic actuators. A face full of warm pressurized
hydraulic fluid is enough to convince even the most die hard GOM that
Never had the 'pleasure' of working on one of those. On the other hand. a
few years back I had to remove the steering rack from a Citroan BX car.
This thing has a hydraulic cylinder on the side to do the power-assisted
steering, and you have to remove that first to get the rest of the rack
out of the car (at least if you don't want to remove the engine first!).
Lying on my back under the car, disconnecting pipes, etc, I got a faceful
of LHM (Citroen's hydraulic fluid). No thanks. And yes I had
depressurised the system first.
electronics has advantages. (GOM is how they used to
refer to us =
peripheral
types - Greasy Ol' Mechanics.)
If you like electro-mechanical, then perhaps you share another interest:
Meccano. I always liked Erector sets until I saw my first Meccano set. =
Ah yes.. Pity the interesting stuff has been discontinued. I still have
my Number 9 set (nver could afford a number 10 set, never will either!), a
couple of the elctrical sets (these contain solenoids, lampholders,
insulating parts, etc, you get to make motors, relays, and the like),
several motors and more.
I
realized then that the US sets were shoddy wanabees. I've been a =
collector
and user of Meccano since the early 70's, when I first met them. =
There's
still a #10 set in the hall closet, though it is probably incomplete =
now.=20
Very nice.
At the Museum where Al K. works is a beautiful Babbage Difference Engine
built out of Red/Green Meccano. It's a gorgeous piece of machinery - =
works
of course. I wish I had that much ambition and skill.
There was a small difference engine made from Meccano (blue/yellow, the
more modern stuff) at a model engineering exhibition in the UK earlier
this year. I wish I'd gone along to see it.
Hve you tried Fischer Technik? It's a lot quicker to assemble than
Meccano, and in some ways a lot more ingenious (there used to be
electronic mocdules, including flip-flops, AND gates, OR gates, etc. Alas
it's all been dumbed down now). Not cheap, but great fun to work with
(it's a lot more than a toy, I can assure you). To get it on-topic here,
there wrre even interfaces for some of the more common home computers to
like to FT motors/lamps/switches. I bought the one for the BBC micro on
E-bay a few months back, I've seen one for the C64 listed there too (but
I am not that interested in that machine).
-tony