4 Feb
2016
4 Feb
'16
1:35 p.m.
At 09:25 AM 2/4/2016, Liam Proven wrote:
A fair point, but then, one is not going to use MS-DOS
to browse the Web in 2016, right?
In my world it is impossible for any one computer to do everything that I need to do with
a computer, thus my five active PCs and many spares, plus old stuff like my CP/M machines
in my personal museum. I don't use an MS-DOS machine to browse, and I don't use an
NT-series-OS machine to run MS-DOS programs that need UART register access that NT does
not allow.
Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html
5 Feb
5 Feb
8:01 a.m.
On 4 February 2016 at 19:35, Dale H. Cook <radiotest at juno.com> wrote:
In my world it is impossible for any one computer to
do everything that I need to do with a computer, thus my five active PCs and many spares,
plus old stuff like my CP/M machines in my personal museum. I don't use an MS-DOS
machine to browse, and I don't use an NT-series-OS machine to run MS-DOS programs that
need UART register access that NT does not allow.
Then you will be fine.
But you are refusing to address the actual point here: people choosing
to use long-obsolete versions of Windows for everyday mainstream use,
which is suicidally risky.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)
3090
days inactive
3091
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
lproven＠gmail.com -
radiotest＠juno.com