On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Erik S. Klein wrote:
I think the
list posted is representative of a not so mature
collector.
I don't know if maturity has anything to do with it. I think the other
names mentioned are just more recognizable (or heralded, as you said).
Why? Because the machines mentioned had more of an impact on the
industry or they were more advertised or more common or all of the
above.
First, when I say "maturity" I mean in the sense of becoming more involved
as a computer collector and learning more about the history. I know when
I first started to collect in earnest I wanted nothing more than an IMSAI
8080. I now realize there are far more interesting machines from the same
era.
The machines mentioned did indeed have a significant impact on the future
of the industry, but it neglects many more machines that were equally (if
not more) significant.
People collect what they are excited about and that
usually doesn't
include more obscure machines.
Yes, but I tend to see it more as the difference between fad collecting
and collecting based on learned knowledge of the history.
I have hundreds of computer magazines from the
seventies and eighties.
I rarely see an ad for HP 9830 but I see ads for IMSAI, Altair and other
mentioned machines a ton.
You're not reading the right journals.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at
www.VintageTech.com *