Dear Friends of Computer History, I would like to dispel a persistent meme that recurs on this list regarding The Computer Museum's non-destruction/sale/folding/spindling/mutilating of computer equipment. First, let us all take a deep breath and lower the temperature of the issue. Epithets and insults are not only unnecessary but unkind, unprofessional, and unworthy of the people within this group (and at the History Center) that genuinely seek to promote computer history by advancing solid, verifiable knowledge claims in an atmosphere of collegiality and mutual interest. Ok, now the issue (or non-issue, to be more precise). The Computer Museum and now The Computer Museum History Center is a federally-registered non-profit corporation whose mission is to preserve and promote the study of computer history and to serve as an international resource in the history of computing. To this end, it employs, with a very modest staff of 5 full-time persons, all reasonable and modern methods to actively collect and disseminate computer history across five separate collections: hardware, software, media (photos, video, films), ephemera, and documentation. It collects broadly across time and industry with no particular institutional, corporate, or personal axes to grind and this ecumenism has made it a trusted source in computer history by the media, scholars, authors, intellectual property specialists, and the general public. The Computer Museum in Boston has recently merged with the Museum of Science there since there was, essentially, insufficient public support for its activities--even after its change of focus to a hands-on, interactive "science center" model. Consequently, the historical collection of the Museum, one of the finest in the world, was moved to the west coast where, in the midst of silicon valley, there would be a financial, regional, and industrial climate that would allow the collection to be seen by the public in an environment supportive of computer history. At this time, the new entity changed names to become "The Computer Museum History Center," reflecting its institutional focus of being a place where computer history can live without financial concerns--which, as you all know, is the ultimate rate-limiting concept behind computer preservation (as well as time/spousal tolerance!). As I see it, the thought that the Museum "sells," "trashes," or "scraps" artifacts is untenable. In nearly four years as curator and manager of historical collectons at the Center, I have no personal knowledge of any such activities. On the contraty, in the best tradition of computer history, artifacts tend to move in the opposite direction--i.e. FROM the landfill/dumpster/garage TO the Center. It is thus somewhat distressting to here claims to the contrary by individuals who, again to my knowledge, have made not the slightest attempt to contact the History Center in order to discuss the issue or otherwise substantiate their public, and frequently insulting, claims. For example, why would "a list" of such non-practices be desired? Similarly, I see little point in addressing the intemperate remarks/epithets used by the individuals below. As a general principle, however, the group should understand the way Museums operate. I believe there have developed two solitudes which I am eager to bridge: on the one hand, the private collector and, on the other hand, the more formal institutional home for computer history. Private collectors bring incredible passion and subject matter knowledge to their efforts; Museums allow long-term preservation (beyond any one individual's lifespan) and an insitutional footprint for computer history that allows widespread propagation and display of computer history. Both communities need each other! Museums, as part of their legal and institutional mission, exchange and loan artifacts with other institutions of equivalent standing (I say "equivalent" mainly to ensure artifacts are protected and cared for). Museums also "de-accession" items, meaning they remove items tenure at the Center and, as any Museum person anywhere can confirm, de-accessioning is an exceedingly rare and messy procedure--the Museum Board must be convened and solid curatorial justification given as to why an item should not form part of a specific collection. It is never taken lightly and undertaken only with great circumspection. Assuming something were to be so de-accsessioned, however, the first order of business would be to ask other Museums if they were interested in adding the item to their collections; if not, the item would likely be placed at public auction (in the interest of fairness--to not privilege or otherwise show favoritism to any one private collector). This procedure is legal, ethical, and standard operating procedure for Museums around the world. It may be painful to be "scooped" or otherwise see that the items we are particularly fond of are becoming increasingly valuable, but that is the way of the world and a sign that the general public as a whole is beginning to realize that vaue of what we collect. Even given this framework, I know of no disposal/auctioning of machines as described below; to assert that the Museum would throw out an Alto seems sheer folly. Again, it is disheartening to keep hearing the same baseless claims by individuals in this group with respect to the Museum's collections policy. These non-truths reverberate and feed on themselves--I really have to wonder for whose benefit they are made given that, again, a simple e-mail to me could have resolved the issue. Let's move on. How can our two communities work together to preserve the history of the machines and people who invented and used them? 1. I invite everyone on this list to visit the History Center in Mountain View, California. 2. Get involved! The Center belongs to the community that supports it and we have dozens of important tasks (both real and virtual) that need to be done and that can draw on the talents of everyone. Drop me a line if you're interested. 3. Visit our website (www.computerhistory.org) and offer suggestions or curate a virtual exhibit! Our site receives well over 2 million hits a month--what a way to get the word out about computer history! 4. Have your own sites linked to (or even archived) by the Center as a way of bringing attention to your specific area of interest. 5. Help the History Center by bringing interesting donation possibilities to its attention. 6. Become a member! We have probably the largest single collection of electronic computing artifacts in the world--yet we are swamped and could really used the help--$$ or time--in our preservation efforts. 7. Spread the word that what we do is worthwhile. If I haven't managed to convince you, please call me personally and I would be pleased to talk with you, on any topic. 8. Join our regular computer history mailing list-- a great way to stay informed about our activities. I hope I have helped explain how the Center operates and that it is working very hard to become worthy of the community that supports it. I fear there has been little communication between list members and the Center, something I am eager to remedy. When people stop talking to one another, it's the first sign that trouble lies ahead. Please get in touch and join us--together we can build something unique in the world that will last long after we are gone and at which future generations will marvel! We're all in this together. Won't you join us? Best wishes, Dag. -- Dag Spicer Curator & Manager of Historical Collections Editorial Board, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing The Computer Museum History Center Building T12-A NASA Ames Research Center Mountain View, CA 94035 Tel: +1 650 604 2578 Fax: +1 650 604 2594 E-m: spicer(a)computerhistory.org WWW: http://www.computerhistory.org <spicer(a)computerhistory.org> PGP: 15E31235 (E6ECDF74 349D1667 260759AD 7D04C178) S/V 516T Read about The Computer Museum History Center in the November issue of WIRED magazine! See "The Computer Hall of Fame - Modern Art." pp. 276 - 299.